INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant |
☒ |
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
☐ |
|
Check the appropriate box:
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as Permitted by Rule 14a-6(E)(2)) |
☒ |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12 |
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ |
No fee required |
☐ |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
☒ |
No fee required. |
|
|
☐ |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
☐ |
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
letter to stockholders
On behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the Ashland Inc. (“Ashland” or the “Company”) management team, thank you for your continued confidence in Ashland. We are pleased to invite you to our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held virtually on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, and form of proxy or voting instruction form are being made available over the Internet or, upon request, delivered by mail on or about December 9, 2024, to stockholders of record.
Fiscal year 2024 highlights
Fiscal 2024 marked a year of evolution as we continued to execute our strategic growth strategy. Key developments and accomplishments during fiscal 2024 include:
Commitment to Board refreshment and diversity
As our Company evolves, so do the skills, qualifications, attributes and experience that the Board seeks in its director nominees. We take a strategic approach to our Board composition and have focused our efforts on adding new Board members whose skills are best aligned with our strategy. Over the last four years we have refreshed our Board with talented and diverse individuals with the necessary skills and expertise to oversee our long-term growth strategy. Since 2020, we have welcomed seven new independent directors. We believe that a dynamic and diverse board that is committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders is essential for our success. To date, our directors’ diverse experience, skills and independent thought leadership have been invaluable to me and our management team in establishing and executing on our long-term business strategy and managing both short-and long-term risks that we may face.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / i |
Looking ahead
As we move into fiscal 2025, we are committed to executing our strategy while remaining focused on delivering sustainable, profitable growth and long-term shareholder value to responsibly solve for a better world.
Your vote is very important to us and we look forward to welcoming you at the Annual Meeting. Regardless of whether you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
Guillermo Novo |
||
|
Chair and Chief Executive Officer |
ii / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
notice of annual meeting of stockholders
to our stockholders:
Ashland Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ashland” or the “Company”), will hold its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) virtually on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. (EST). The Annual Meeting will be held online via live webcast for the purposes listed below:
where: |
|
Via a live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ASH2025 There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting |
|
items of business: |
|
(1) |
To elect nine directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until each of their successors has been elected and qualified; |
|
|
(2) |
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025; |
|
|
(3) |
To consider and vote upon a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers; and |
|
|
(4) |
To consider any other business properly brought before the Annual Meeting. |
who can vote: |
|
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on November 25, 2024 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment of the Annual Meeting. |
you can vote in one of several ways: |
||
|
|
|
|
VIA THE INTERNET. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you can access our proxy materials and vote online. Instructions to vote online are included in the Notice. |
|
|
|
|
|
BY TELEPHONE. Call the telephone number specified on your proxy card or visit the website on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
BY MAIL. If you received paper copies of your proxy materials in the mail, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope provided to vote. |
If you are a participant in the Ashland Employee Savings Plan (“Employee Savings Plan”), the Ashland Union Employee Savings Plan (“Union Plan”) or the International Specialty Products Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “ISP Plan”), your vote will constitute voting instructions to Fidelity Management Trust Company, who serves as trustee of the Plans (“Trustee”), for the shares held in your account.
If you are a participant in the Employee Savings Plan, the Union Plan or the ISP Plan, then our proxy tabulator, Alliance Advisors LLC or its agent, must receive all voting instructions, whether given by telephone, over the Internet or by mail, before 5:00 p.m. (EST) on Wednesday, January 15, 2025.
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
Robin E. Lampkin |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Wilmington, Delaware
December 9, 2024
|
|
2025 proxy statement / iii |
table of contents
(i) |
|
45 |
|||
|
|
|
45 |
||
(iii) |
|
47 |
|||
|
|
|
48 |
||
1 |
|
49 |
|||
|
|
|
50 |
||
3 |
|
51 |
|||
3 |
|
|
|||
3 |
|
|
|
||
7 |
|
59 |
|||
9 |
|
|
|
||
9 |
|
60 |
|||
9 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
65 |
|||
10 |
|
|
|||
11 |
|
|
|
||
11 |
|
66 |
|||
12 |
|
|
|
||
12 |
|
68 |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
13 |
|
|
|||
13 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
69 |
|||
13 |
|
|
|||
14 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
70 |
||
16 |
|
|
|||
16 |
|
|
|
||
16 |
|
71 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
72 |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
20 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
77 |
||
25 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
79 |
||
28 |
|
|
|
||
28 |
|
79 |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
30 |
|
a-1 |
|||
32 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
33 |
|
frequently referenced |
|||
|
|
||||
34 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
3 |
|
||
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
28 |
|
||
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
45 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
proxy summary
This proxy summary does not contain all the information that you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. For more complete information regarding Ashland's fiscal 2024 performance, please review the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024.
annual meeting information
date Tuesday, January 21, 2025 |
|
time 10:30 a.m. (EST) |
|
place Via a live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ASH2025 |
|
record date Monday, November 25, 2024 |
voting matters
At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will be asked to vote on the following proposals and to conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting.
Proposal |
Our Board’s Recommendation |
|
1 |
The election of nine director nominees (page 19) |
FOR |
2 |
Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Ashland’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025 (page 65) |
FOR |
3 |
A non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers (page 68) |
FOR |
In order to participate in the Annual Meeting, you must register before 10:00 a.m. (EST) on Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ASH2025. For more information about the Annual Meeting, including how to register, vote and attend, please see page 72 of this Proxy Statement.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, and form of proxy or voting instruction form are being made available over the Internet or, upon request, delivered by mail on or about December 9, 2024, to stockholders of record.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 1 |
proxy summary
our company
Ashland is a global, consumer market-focused additives and specialty ingredients company that is responsibly solving for a better world. Through science and a conscious and proactive mindset for sustainability, we serve customers in the pharmaceutical, personal care, architectural coatings, construction, energy, food and beverage industries.
At Ashland, we are approximately 3,200 passionate, tenacious solvers who thrive on developing practical, innovative, and elegant solutions to complex problems for customers in more than 100 countries.
fiscal 2024 financial highlights(1)
sales of $2.1 billion down 4 percent |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjusted EBIT of $240 million up roughly 11% |
|
adjusted EBIT margin of 11.4% up roughly 15.2% |
|
adjusted EBITDA of $459 million flat |
|
adjusted EBITDA margin of 21.7% up 80 basis points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjusted EPS (excluding intangible amortization)(2) of $4.45 up 9% |
|
FCF $325 million up from $124 million driven by favorable working capital and lower capital expenditures |
||||
|
||||||
|
(1) All figures other than sales are non-GAAP measures. Appendix A reconciles adjusted amounts to amounts reported under GAAP, including reconciliations of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, earnings per share to adjusted earnings per share, excluding intangible amortization.
(2) Unless otherwise noted, earnings are reported on a diluted-share basis.
board governance highlights
We are committed to good corporate governance, which strengthens the accountability of our board of directors (the “Board”) and promotes the long-term interests of our stockholders. The list below highlights our Board and leadership practices, as discussed further in this Proxy Statement.
☑ annual election of directors |
☑ majority independent board
|
☑ lead independent director |
☑ fully independent governance committee
|
☑ annual board evaluations |
☑ continuing director education program
|
☑ board oversight of risk and enterprise strategy |
☑ robust stock ownership guidelines for directors
|
☑ annual review of committee charters and corporate governance guidelines |
☑ regular executive sessions of independent directors |
2 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
corporate governance
corporate governance
board leadership structure
The Board's leadership structure consists of a combined role of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and a Lead Independent Director. The Board believes that combining the positions of Chair and Chief Executive Officer provides clarity of leadership and is in the best interests of Ashland and its stockholders at this time. The Chair of the Board sets agendas for, and presides over, Board meetings and stockholder meetings. In addition, each Board committee is led by a chair, and similarly, the Board committee chairs set agendas for, and preside over, the meetings and executive sessions held by their respective committees.
The Lead Independent Director is an independent director appointed annually by the Governance and Nominating Committee (the “G&N Committee”) and approved by the Board. The appointment of a Lead Independent Director provides balance to the combined role of the Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes the use of a Lead Independent Director provides appropriate independent oversight of management. Independent oversight has been further assured by having only one member of management on the Board. The non-employee directors regularly meet in executive session at Board meetings.
Guillermo Novo currently holds the combined role of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The role of Lead Independent Director is currently held by Susan L. Main.
In addition to the duties of all Board members, the Lead Independent Director:
board committees
The Board currently has four standing committees: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee; Environmental, Health, Safety & Quality Committee (“EHS&Q Committee”); and Governance & Nominating Committee. All Committees are currently composed entirely of independent directors. Listed below is the current membership of each Committee:
Audit Committee |
|
Compensation Committee |
|
Environmental, Health, Safety and Quality Committee |
|
Governance and Nominating Committee |
Sergio Pedreiro(1) |
|
Suzan F. Harrison(1) |
|
Janice J. Teal(1) |
|
Jerome A. Peribere(1) |
Wetteny Joseph |
|
Steven D. Bishop |
|
Steven D. Bishop |
|
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
Susan L. Main |
|
Ashish K. Kulkarni |
|
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
|
Suzan F. Harrison |
Jerome A. Peribere |
|
Sergio Pedreiro |
|
Wetteny Joseph |
|
Susan L. Main |
Scott A. Tozier |
|
Janice J. Teal |
|
Ashish K. Kulkarni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott A. Tozier |
|
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 3 |
corporate governance
Following are descriptions of the primary responsibilities of each committee and the number of meetings held during fiscal 2024. Each committee’s charter is available on Ashland’s website (http://investor.ashland.com).
audit committee |
|
meetings in fiscal 2024: 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sergio Pedreiro |
|
Wetteny Joseph |
|
Susan L. Main |
|
Jerome A. Peribere |
|
Scott A. Tozier |
(Chair) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
summary of responsibilities
o Oversees Ashland’s financial reporting process, including earnings releases and the filing of financial reports. o Reviews management’s implementation and maintenance of adequate systems of internal accounting and financial controls (including internal control over financial reporting). o Evaluates Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) disclosures and confirms ESG framework and standards, and disclosure control systems. o Selects independent auditors based on qualification and independence and approves audit fees and services performed by the independent auditors. o Reviews the effectiveness of Ashland’s legal and regulatory compliance programs. o Discusses the overall scope and plans for audits with both internal and independent auditors. o Reviews and investigates any matters pertaining to the integrity of executive management and oversees compliance by management with laws, regulations and Ashland’s Global Code of Conduct. o Establishes and maintains procedures for handling complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters. |
|
o Reviews and oversees Ashland’s capital allocation framework, including prioritization, significant decisions and risk considerations relating to Ashland’s financial resources, capital structure and investments and uses of cash. o Reviews Ashland’s enterprise risk assessment and risk management policies, including Ashland’s major enterprise and financial risk exposures and steps taken by management to monitor and mitigate such exposures. o Evaluates and recommends actions regarding significant financial issues such as capital structure, dividend policy, offerings of corporate securities, major borrowings, credit facilities, derivatives and swaps policies (including entry into swaps in reliance on the end-user exception), past audits of capital investments, capital projects, commercial commitments and merger, acquisition and divestiture activities. o Oversees funding and investment policy related to employee benefit plans. o Reviews performance and operation of internal audit, including the head of internal audit, and reviews adverse audit reports. o Reviews the Company’s information and cyber security risks and programs. |
4 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
corporate governance
compensation committee |
|
meetings in fiscal 2024: 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Suzan F. Harrison |
|
Steven D. Bishop |
|
Ashish K. Kulkarni |
Sergio Pedreiro |
|
Janice J. Teal |
(Chair) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
summary of responsibilities
o Ensures Ashland’s executive compensation programs are appropriately competitive, supports organizational objectives and stockholder interests and emphasizes pay for performance linkage. o Evaluates and approves compensation and sets performance criteria for compensation programs with respect to Ashland’s Chief Executive Officer. o Evaluates and approves compensation and sets performance criteria for compensation programs for all executive officers (including all officers subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. o Oversees the execution of Chief Executive Officer and senior management development and succession plans, including HR-related business continuity plans. o Approves any employment agreements, consulting arrangements, severance or retirement arrangements, change in control agreements and/or any other special or supplemental benefits covering any current or former executive officer. o Adopts, amends, terminates and performs other design functions for Ashland’s benefit plans. |
|
o Oversees the implementation and administration of Ashland’s executive compensation plans. o Monitors and evaluates Ashland’s compensation and benefits structure, providing guidance on philosophy, policy matters and excessive risk taking (including Committee specific ESG related activities). o Oversees regulatory compliance on compensation matters, including Ashland’s policies on structuring compensation programs to preserve tax deductibility. o Oversees the preparation of the annual report on executive compensation. o Oversees the retention of compensation consultants, independent legal counsel or other advisors and determines independence of the same. o Oversees progress on talent, succession planning, pay equity, inclusion and diversity. |
compensation committee interlocks and insider participation
The members of the Compensation Committee for fiscal 2024 were Suzan F. Harrison (Chair), Steven D. Bishop, Ashish K. Kulkarni, Sergio Pedreiro and Janice J. Teal. Brendan Cummins served as Chair of the Compensation Committee until his retirement on January 23, 2024. There were no impermissible interlocks or inside directors on the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to delegate to subcommittees of the Compensation Committee, any of the responsibilities of the full committee.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 5 |
corporate governance
environmental, health, safety and quality committee |
|
meetings in fiscal 2024: 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Janice J. Teal |
|
Steven D. Bishop |
|
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
|
Wetteny Joseph |
|
Ashish K. Kulkarni |
|
Scott A. Tozier |
(Chair) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
summary of responsibilities
o Oversees and reviews Ashland’s environmental, health and safety (“EHS”), quality, environmental ESG and compliance policies, programs, practices and audits and any issues, as well as competitors’ activities and industry best practices. o Oversees and reviews EHS regulatory trends, including Ashland’s overall compliance, remediation and sustainability efforts. o Oversees and reviews product safety and quality trends, issues and concerns which affect or could affect Ashland’s product safety or quality practices, including Ashland’s overall efforts related to product safety and quality and environmental ESG. |
|
o Oversees, reviews and receives updates on Ashland’s policies regarding environmental, health, safety and quality compliance and business continuity risks. o Reports to the Board concerning implementation of EHS, quality and environmental ESG compliance policies and assists the Board in assuring Ashland’s compliance with those policies. o Reviews and approves EHS and environmental ESG performance targets. |
6 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
corporate governance
governance and nominating committee |
|
meetings in fiscal 2024: 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Jerome A. Peribere |
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
Suzan F. Harrison |
|
|
Susan L. Main |
(Chair) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
summary of responsibilities
o Recommends nominees for the Board and its Committees. o Reviews suggested potential candidates for the Board. o Recommends desirable size and composition of the Board and its Committees. o Recommends to the Board programs and procedures relating to director compensation, evaluation, retention and resignation. o Reviews corporate governance guidelines, corporate charters and proposed amendments to Ashland’s Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws. o Reviews transactions pursuant to the Related Person Transaction Policy. |
|
o Assists the Board in ensuring the Board’s independence as it exercises its corporate governance and oversight roles. o Oversees the evaluation of the Board, exercises oversight of Ashland’s ESG activities and monitors Ashland’s external ESG communication strategy, including Ashland’s ESG report. o Reviews the process for succession planning for the Board. o Reviews all Committee charters. o Reviews and makes recommendations to address stockholder proposals. o Oversees the administration of the equity plans and awards, solely with respect to non-employee directors. |
board effectiveness
meetings, attendance and executive sessions
Directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they serve. In addition, Ashland has a policy and practice of strongly encouraging all directors to attend the Annual Meeting. During fiscal 2024, 8 meetings of the Board were held. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the Board and the Committees on which he or she served. Overall attendance at Board and Committee meetings was 98%. All directors were present at the Annual Meeting held on January 23, 2024. The independent directors meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, and at other times as they may determine appropriate. The Audit and Compensation Committees of the Board meet in executive session during every regular committee meeting. Other Board committees meet in executive session at the discretion of the committee members.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 7 |
corporate governance
director orientation and continuing education
New directors are required to participate in an orientation program within a reasonable time after being elected to serve as a director. The orientation program includes background materials and meetings with senior management on subjects that would assist them in discharging their duties as directors. All directors are encouraged to stay abreast of developing trends applicable to Ashland's business and specific to service as a director. Directors may be expected to participate in continuing educational programs relating to Ashland’s business, corporate governance or other issues pertaining to their directorships in order to maintain the necessary level of expertise to perform their responsibilities as directors. Ashland also provides all directors with membership in the National Association of Corporate Directors.
annual board performance assessments
The Board is committed to continuous improvement and uses annual self-assessments to determine whether it and its committees are functioning effectively. The G&N Committee receives comments from all directors and reports to the Board with an annual assessment of the Board’s performance. The assessment focuses on the Board’s contribution to the Company and specifically focuses on areas in which the Board or management believes the Board or any of its committees could improve.
8 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
corporate governance
board’s role of risk oversight
full board |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Has ultimate oversight responsibility with respect to Ashland’s risk management strategies and processes. This includes receiving regular reports from, and working with, the management team to determine and assess the Company’s philosophy and strategy towards risk management and mitigation. The Board reviews in detail the Company’s most significant risks and whether management is responding consistently within the Company’s overall risk management and mitigation strategy. The following Ashland Board committees further assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to certain areas of risk. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
audit committee |
|
environmental, health, safety and quality committee |
|
compensation committee |
|
governance and nominating committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintains responsibility for overseeing risks related to Ashland’s financial reporting, audit process, internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls, procedures, information and cybersecurity programs as well as the global ethics and compliance program. |
|
Assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to environmental, health, safety, product compliance and business continuity risks. |
|
Monitors and evaluates the compensation and benefits structure of the Company, including providing guidance on philosophy and policy matters and excessive risk-taking. |
|
Conducts an annual review of nominees to the Board and is charged with developing and recommending to the Board corporate governance principles and policies and Board Committee structure, leadership and membership. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
management |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is responsible for the day-to-day management of risk, and they report periodically to the Board and specific committees on current and emerging risks and the Company’s approach to avoiding and mitigating risk exposure. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
director independence and certain relationships
The Board has adopted Director Independence Standards (the “Standards”) to assist in its determination of director independence. These Standards are available to stockholders on Ashland’s website (https://investor.ashland.com/committee-details/director-independence-standards). To qualify as independent under these Standards, the Board must affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with Ashland, other than as a director.
Pursuant to the Standards, Ashland’s Board undertakes an annual review of director independence. During this review, the Board considers relationships and transactions between, on the one hand, each director or nominee, any member of his or her immediate family, and his or her affiliates, and on the other hand, Ashland and its subsidiaries and affiliates. As provided for in the Standards, the purpose of this review is to determine whether any such relationships or transactions are inconsistent with a determination that the director or nominee is independent.
As a result of the annual director independence review, Ashland's Board affirmatively determined that Messrs. Bishop, Chattopadhyay, Joseph, Pedreiro, Peribere, Tozier, and Dr. Kulkarni and Mses. Harrison,
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 9 |
corporate governance
Main and Dr. Teal are each independent of Ashland and its affiliates. Mr. Novo, Ashland’s Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board, is the only director determined not to be independent of Ashland. In addition, the Board has affirmatively determined that all members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and G&N Committee are independent under SEC rules and the applicable listing standards of the NYSE.
In the normal course of business, Ashland has transactions with other corporations where certain Ashland directors serve as executive officers. The following relationships between Ashland and the director-affiliated entity are not material pursuant to the Standards, and the transactions are not a “Related Person Transactions,” as defined in the Related Person Transaction Policy:
Sanat Chattopadhyay, a director of Ashland, currently serves as the Executive Vice President of Merck & Co (“Merck”). During fiscal 2024, the Company paid approximately $131,686 to Merck for certain products.
Wetteny Joseph, a director of Ashland, currently serves as the Chief Financial Officer of Zoetis, Inc. (“Zoetis”). During fiscal 2024, Zoetis paid approximately $252,784 to Ashland for certain products and/or services.
Scott A. Tozier, a director of Ashland, currently serves as the strategic advisor to the CEO of Albemarle Corporation (“Albemarle”) and previously served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Albemarle until his retirement in November 2023. During fiscal 2024, the Company paid approximately $239,709 to Albemarle for certain products.
There are no material legal proceedings to which any director, director nominee or executive officer of Ashland is a party adverse to Ashland or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to Ashland or any of its subsidiaries.
There are no family relationships between any director of Ashland, executive officer of Ashland or person nominated or chosen to become a director or executive officer of Ashland.
Federal securities laws require Ashland to describe any transaction since the beginning of the last fiscal year, or any currently proposed transaction, in which (i) Ashland was or is to be a participant, (ii) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (iii) in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Related persons include directors and executive officers, nominees for director and any immediate family members of directors, executive officers or nominees for director. There have been no transactions since October 1, 2023, nor are there any currently proposed transactions, in which (i) Ashland was or is to be a participant, (ii) the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 and (iii) any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Ashland is also required to describe its policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of any Related Person Transaction.
Pursuant to Ashland’s written Related Person Transaction Policy (“Policy”), the G&N Committee is responsible for reviewing the material facts of any transactions that could potentially be “transactions with related persons”. The Policy covers any transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) in which (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, (2) Ashland is a participant, and (3) any related person has or will have a direct or indirect interest (other than solely as a result of being a director or a less than 10% beneficial owner of another entity). Transactions between Ashland and any firm, corporation or entity in which a related person is an executive officer or general partner, or in which any related persons collectively hold more than 10% of the ownership interests, are also subject to review under the Policy.
10 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
corporate governance
Under the Policy, Ashland’s directors and executive officers are required to identify annually, and on an as-needed basis, potential transactions with related persons or their firms that meet the criteria set forth in the Policy, and management is required to forward all such disclosures to the G&N Committee. The G&N Committee reviews each disclosed transaction. The G&N Committee has discretion to approve, disapprove or otherwise act if a transaction is deemed to be a Related Person Transaction subject to the Policy. Only disinterested members of the G&N Committee may participate in the determinations made with regard to a particular transaction. If it is impractical to convene a meeting of the G&N Committee, the Chair of the G&N Committee is authorized to make a determination and promptly report such determination in writing to the other G&N Committee members. All determinations made under the Policy are required to be reported to the full Board.
Under the Policy and consistent with SEC regulations, certain transactions are not Related Person Transactions, even if such transactions exceed $120,000 in a fiscal year. Those exceptions are:
corporate governance guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines in furtherance of its continuing efforts to enhance its corporate governance. These guidelines provide the framework for the Board’s governance of Ashland and include a general description of the Board’s purpose, director qualification standards, retirement and resignation policies and other responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines require that at least two-thirds of Ashland’s directors be independent, as defined in the Standards, which incorporate the independence requirements of the SEC rules and the listing standards of the NYSE. A copy of our current Corporate Governance Guidelines is published on Ashland’s website (http://investor.ashland.com) and are also available in print at no cost to any stockholder who requests them.
global code of conduct
Ashland requires compliance with its Global Code of Conduct which applies to all of Ashland’s directors and employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. The Global Code of Conduct promotes honest and ethical conduct, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, prompt reporting of violations of the Code and full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports filed with the SEC. Ashland intends to post any amendments or waivers of the Code (to the extent applicable to Ashland’s directors and executive officers) on Ashland’s website or in a Current Report on Form 8-K. A copy of our current Global Code of Conduct is published on Ashland’s website (http://investor.ashland.com) and is also available in print at no cost to any stockholder who requests them.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 11 |
corporate governance
insider trading policy
Ashland has adopted an insider trading policy (the “Insider Trading Policy”) to govern the purchase, sale, and other dispositions of Ashland securities by our directors, officers, and employees. The Insider Trading Policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, and any listing standards applicable to the Company.
communication with directors
The Board has established a process by which stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board. Persons interested in communicating with the Board, or with a specific member or Committee of the Board, may do so by writing to the Lead Independent Director in care of the Company’s Corporate Secretary, 8145 Blazer Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808. Communications directed to the Lead Independent Director will be reviewed by the Corporate Secretary and distributed to the Lead Independent Director as well as to other individual directors, as appropriate, depending on the subject matter and facts and circumstances outlined in the correspondence. Communications that are not related to the duties and responsibilities of the Board, or are otherwise inappropriate, will not be forwarded to the Lead Independent Director, although all communications directed to the Board will be available to any director upon request.
12 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
director compensation
director compensation
Ashland’s non-employee director compensation program is designed to attract and retain highly qualified directors and further align their interests with those of our stockholders. The G&N Committee reviews the director compensation program on an annual basis and recommends proposed changes for approval by the Board. As part of this review, the G&N Committee considers the significant amount of time expended, and the skill level required, by each non-employee director in fulfilling his or her duties on the Board, each director’s role and involvement on the Board and its committees and the market compensation practices and levels of our peer companies.
2024 annual non-employee director compensation program
annual cash retainer
The following table sets forth the annual cash retainers for the Board and the additional cash retainers paid to the Lead Independent Director and committee chairs under the 2024 non-employee director compensation program:
Retainer Type |
|
Annually |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Retainer |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
Lead Independent Director Retainer |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
Audit Committee Chair Retainer |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
All Other Committees Chair Retainer |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
restricted stock units
Under the 2024 non-employee director compensation program, directors also receive an annual grant of restricted stock units having an aggregate value on the grant date of $150,000 (pro-rated as applicable for less than a full year of service). The restricted stock units vest one year after date of grant. Upon the payment of dividends on the Company’s common stock, directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional restricted stock units. Upon a “change in control” of Ashland, the restricted stock units immediately vest.
deferred compensation plan
Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Non-employee directors who make an election to defer part or all of any annual cash retainer may have the deferred amounts held as common stock units (share equivalents) in a hypothetical Ashland Common Stock Fund or invested under the other available investment options under the Directors’ Deferral Plan. The payout of the amounts deferred occurs upon termination of service by the director. Directors may elect to receive the payout in a single lump sum or in installments not to exceed 15 years. Upon a “change in control” of Ashland (as defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors), amounts deferred in a director’s deferral accounts will be distributed pursuant to each director’s election and valued at the time of the distribution.
stock ownership guidelines for directors
The Board of Directors considers Ashland Common Stock ownership by directors to be of utmost importance. The Board believes that such ownership enhances the commitment of directors to Ashland’s future and enhances the alignment of their interests with those of Ashland’s other stockholders. The Board has therefore established minimum stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors which require each director to own Ashland Common Stock having a value of at least five times his or her base annual
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 13 |
director compensation
cash retainer of $100,000. Each newly elected director has five years from the year first elected to the Board to reach this ownership level. The following table shows each non-employee directors compliance status with the Ashland’s director stock ownership guidelines as of September 30, 2024:
Name |
|
Total Shares Required |
|
Total Shares Held |
|
Guidelines Met |
|
Ownership Deadline |
Steven D. Bishop |
|
5,749 |
|
6,357 |
|
Y |
|
|
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
|
5,749 |
|
2,607 |
|
N |
|
November 2028 |
Suzan F. Harrison |
|
5,749 |
|
3,877 |
|
N |
|
July 2027 |
Wetteny Joseph |
|
5,749 |
|
5,909 |
|
Y |
|
|
Ashish Kulkarni |
|
5,749 |
|
1,019 |
|
N |
|
April 2029 |
Susan L. Main |
|
5,749 |
|
13,399 |
|
Y |
|
|
Sergio Pedreiro |
|
5,749 |
|
2,799 |
|
N |
|
July 2028 |
Jerome A. Peribere |
|
5,749 |
|
12,485 |
|
Y |
|
|
Janice J. Teal |
|
5,749 |
|
39,629 |
|
Y |
|
|
Scott Tozier |
|
5,749 |
|
1,153 |
|
N |
|
April 2029 |
2024 director compensation table
The following table provides the compensation paid to Ashland’s non-employee directors for fiscal 2024:
Name |
|
Fees Earned or |
|
Stock |
|
All Other |
|
|
Total |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan L. Main |
|
|
130,343 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
280,301 |
|
Steven D. Bishop |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
249,958 |
|
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
|
|
88,425 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
238,383 |
|
Suzan F. Harrison |
|
|
110,343 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
260,301 |
|
Wetteny Joseph |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
249,958 |
|
Sergio Pedreiro |
|
|
113,791 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
263,749 |
|
Jerome A. Peribere |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
264,958 |
|
Janice J. Teal |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
149,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
264,958 |
|
Scott A. Tozier |
|
|
46,154 |
|
|
|
106,951 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
153,105 |
|
Ashish K. Kulkarni |
|
|
40,385 |
|
|
|
98,313 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
138,698 |
|
Brendan M. Cummins(1) |
|
|
35,701 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
35,701 |
|
Jay V. Ihlenfeld(1) |
|
|
41,909 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
41,909 |
|
14 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
director compensation
Mr. Tozier received a pro-rated grant of 1,143 restricted stock units rounded down to the nearest whole share of Ashland Common Stock in the Directors’ Stock Plan on April 15, 2024, with a grant date fair value per share of restricted stock unit of $93.57 per share of Ashland Common Stock.
Dr. Kulkarni received a pro-rated grant of 1,010 restricted stock units rounded down to the nearest whole share of Ashland Common Stock in the Directors’ Stock Plan on May 6, 2024, with a grant date fair value per share of restricted stock unit of $97.34 per share of Ashland Common Stock.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 15 |
director diversity, skills and qualifications
director diversity, skills and qualifications
The G&N Committee identifies, evaluates, and recommends to the Board qualified director candidates to be nominated for election at each annual meeting of stockholders. The G&N Committee selects each director nominee based on the nominee’s skills, achievements and experience. The G&N Committee reviews all director candidates in accordance with its charter and Ashland’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and will identify qualified individuals consistent with criteria approved by the Board. The G&N Committee has sole discretion and authority to retain, compensate, and terminate independent professional search firms to identify and suggest director candidates from time to time. During fiscal year 2024, the G&N Committee retained Egon Zehnder, an independent executive search firm, to assist with its director search. As a result, Ashish K. Kulkarni, Ph.D. was identified by Egon Zehnder and recommended by the G&N Committee to be elected to the Board in May 2024. Scott A. Tozier, who was elected to the Board in April 2024, was brought to the attention of the G&N Committee by a non-management member of the Board.
Stockholders may also recommend director candidates by providing prior written notice to the G&N Committee. Page 77 of this Proxy Statement provides important information for stockholders seeking to submit a potential candidate or candidates for consideration for election at the 2026 Annual Meeting.
board diversity and tenure
Our Board strives to maintain an independent and diverse group of qualified director nominees that bring diverse backgrounds and viewpoints and that reflect the diversity of our stockholders, employees, customers, guests and communities. The following charts provides the gender and racial/ethnic diversity and years of tenure of our director nominees. More information about our director nominees can be found on page 20.
director nominee skills and qualifications
The G&N Committee strives to select individuals as director nominees who exhibit the highest personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and who shall be most effective in serving the interests of Ashland’s stockholders. The following matrix identifies certain skills and experience that the G&N Committee and the Board believe that the Board, as a collective group must have for the effective oversight of Ashland and our strategy. The table is intended to serve as a high-level summary and not an exhaustive list of each director nominee's skills, capabilities or contributions to the Board. The biographies of the director nominees on page 20 includes more information about our directors’ relevant skills, experience and qualifications.
16 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
director diversity, skills and qualifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
experience and skills relevant to oversight and governance |
||||||||||
CEO experience: past or current experience serving as a public company CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
corporate governance: governance expertise gained through board service or experience as a public company executive |
||||||||||
financial/accounting: experience in a financial leadership role (i.e., CFO, CAO, Controller, etc.) requiring an understanding of financial statements, financial reporting, financial transactions, and capital allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
cybersecurity and information technology: experience overseeing an information technology program and managing cybersecurity risks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
legal/regulatory/public policy: experience with governmental regulations applicable to the company’s industry, experience in legal and regulatory compliance, lobbying, advocacy and government relations |
|
|
|
|
||||||
experience and skills relevant to oversight of our strategy |
||||||||||
chemicals industry: demonstrated experience working the in the chemicals industry |
|
|
|
|
||||||
manufacturing/operational experience: senior leadership experience managing and/or overseeing the manufacturing operations/supply chain of a private or public company |
|
|||||||||
global business strategy and management: experience driving business success in global markets, with an understanding of global issues that affect our company |
||||||||||
business development, M&A: experience leading growth through acquisitions and other business combinations |
||||||||||
sales and marketing: senior level experience managing sales and marketing strategies relevant to our business |
|
|
|
|
||||||
sustainability: experience in operating a sustainable business and/or the oversight of environmental matters and corporate responsibility |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
technology & innovation: experience developing and assessing new product designs and technological trends and/or efficiency improvements through technology |
|
|
|
|||||||
investor engagement: experience communicating with analysts and shareholders |
||||||||||
human capital management: experience in organizational management and talent development, compensation matters and oversight of social issues, such as diversity and inclusion |
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 17 |
director diversity, skills and qualifications
18 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
proposal one — election of directors
overview
Stockholders are being asked to elect nine directors. The nine individuals nominated by the Board for election as directors at the 2025 Annual Meeting are Steven D. Bishop, Sanat Chattopadhyay, Suzan F. Harrison, Ashish K. Kulkarni, Susan L. Main, Guillermo Novo, Sergio Pedreiro, Jerome A. Peribere and Scott A. Tozier, Wetteny Joseph and Janice J. Teal are not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting, and as a result, on November 13, 2024, the Board reduced the size of the Board from eleven to nine, effective immediately after the Annual Meeting.
Each of the director nominees satisfies the independence criteria set forth in the corporate governance standards of the New York Stock Exchange, other than Mr. Novo, Ashland’s Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
required vote
As provided under Article V of Ashland’s Certificate of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast with respect to each director nominee will be required for the nominee to be elected. A majority of votes cast means that the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast either for or against the nominees and will have no effect on the election of nominees.
Pursuant to Ashland’s Certificate of Incorporation, any nominee who is serving as a director at the time of an uncontested election who fails to receive a greater number of votes “for” his or her election than votes “against” his or her election shall submit an offer to resign from the Board no later than two weeks after the certification of the stockholder vote. Pursuant to the Board of Directors’ resignation policy, which is included in Ashland’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and published on Ashland’s website (http://investor.ashland.com)), the Board will decide, through a process managed by the G&N Committee, whether to accept the resignation within 90 days following the date of the stockholder meeting. The Company will then promptly disclose the Board’s decision and reasons therefor. As a condition to his or her nomination, each person nominated by the G&N Committee must agree in advance to abide by the policy. All nine of your Board’s director nominees have agreed to abide by the policy.
If you submit a validly executed proxy card or voting instruction form but do not specify how you want to vote your shares with respect to the election of directors, then your shares will be voted in line with the Board’s recommendation with respect to the proposal, i.e., FOR the nine nominees proposed by your Board and named in this Proxy Statement. Should any of your Board’s nominees be unable or unwilling to stand for election at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies named on your proxy card may vote for a replacement nominee recommended by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting. At this time, the Board knows of no reason why any of the Board’s nominees would not be able to serve as a director if elected.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR each of our nine nominees for director. |
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 19 |
director nominees
The following sets forth information as to each director nominee for election, including their age, experience (including principal occupation during the past five years, current public company directorships and public company directorships held during the past five years), and qualifications:
Steven D. Bishop |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Independent Director
director since: 2022 age: 60 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Steven D. Bishop, retired from Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) in 2022 as Chief Executive Officer of Procter and Gamble Healthcare, a role that he held since 2019. Mr. Bishop joined Procter & Gamble in 1986 and spent nearly 36 years with Procter & Gamble in various senior leadership roles, including Group President from 2015 to 2018.
education: Mr. Bishop holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Economics from Purdue
other public company boards: None
director qualifications: Mr. Bishop has significant knowledge and expertise in global P&L management,
board committees: o Compensation Committee o Environmental, Health, Safety and Quality Committee
|
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Executive Vice President
director since: 2023 age: 65 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Sanat Chattopadhyay is the Executive Vice President and President, Manufacturing
education: Mr. Chattopadhyay holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India and a post-graduate degree in Industrial Engineering from the Indian Institute of Management (IIM Mumbai), formerly known as the National Institute for Training in Industrial Engineering (NITIE Mumbai).
other public company boards: None.
director qualifications: Mr. Chattopadhyay brings extensive leadership and business knowledge and
board committees: o Environmental, Health, Safety and Quality Committee o Governance and Nominating Committee
|
20 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
director nominees
Suzan F. Harrison |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Independent Director
director since: 2022 age: 67 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Suzan F. Harrison retired from the Colgate Palmolive Company (NYSE: CL) in 2019 as
education: Ms. Harrison holds a Bachelor of Science degree in marketing and business from
other public company boards: Since May 2017, Ms. Harrison has served on the Board of Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE: ADM) and as Chair of the Sustainability and Technology Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Ms. Harrison also serves on the Board of Smurfit Westrock plc (NYSE: SW) and as a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, roles she has held since January 2020.
director qualifications: Ms. Harrison has extensive global business experience, consumer markets
board committees: o Compensation Committee o Governance and Nominating Committee
|
Ashish K. Kulkarni, Ph.D. |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Chief Executive Officer of Kebotix, Inc.
director since: 2024 age: 55 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Dr. Ashish K. Kulkarni has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Kebotix, Inc., a startup company focused on commercializing artificial intelligence methods into new material commercialization since 2022. From 2020 to 2022, Dr. Kulkarni served as Executive Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer of GAF. From 2016 to 2019, Dr. Kulkarni served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Technology and Innovation Officer of Avantar, Inc. (NYSE: AVTR), a global manufacturer and distributor in the biopharmaceutical, healthcare, education and government and advanced technologies and applied materials industries. From 2010 to 2016, Dr. Kulkarni was Chief Technology and Innovation Officer of Celanese Corporation (NYSE: CE). Dr. Kulkarni also held various leadership positions at United Technologies Corporation, American Standard and General Electric (NYSE: GE).
education: Dr. Kulkarni holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering and a Master of Science in Chemical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
other public company boards: None.
director qualifications: Dr. Kulkarni brings significant experience over a 28-year career, in innovation models and methods, R&D, strategic planning, technology including cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and robotics technologies for materials, business transformation credentials, and diversity.
board committees: o Compensation Committee o Environmental, Health, Safety and Quality Committee
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 21 |
director nominees
Susan L. Main |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Independent Director
director since: 2017 age: 66 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Susan L. Main retired from Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (NYSE: TDY) in 2023
education: Ms. Main holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration, with an
other public company boards: Since September 2023, Ms. Main has served on the Board of Allegion PLC (NYSE: ADM) and as Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee. Ms. Main previously served on
director qualifications: Ms. Main brings significant management and public company financial experience and knowledge to the Board in the areas of operations, risk oversight and corporate
board committees: o Compensation Committee (Chair) o Governance and Nominating Committee
|
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Ashland Inc.
director since: 2019 age: 62 independent: No |
|
professional experience: Guillermo Novo is Chief Executive Officer of Ashland since December 2019 and has
education: Mr. Novo holds a Bachelor of Science degree in industrial engineering from the
other public company boards: Since February 2021, Mr. Novo has served on the Board of PPG Industries, Inc. (NYSE: PPG) and as Chair of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Human Capital Management and Compensation Committee. Mr. Novo previously served on the
director qualifications: Mr. Novo brings over thirty years of leadership experience in the specialty materials
|
22 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
director nominees
Sergio Pedreiro |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Chief Financial Officer, New Wave Tech SA
director since: 2023 age: 59 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Sergio Pedreiro is the Chief Financial Officer of New Wave Tech SA since December 2022. Mr Pedreiro retired from Revlon, Inc. in 2020 as the Chief Operating Officer. From
education: Mr. Pedreiro holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Aeronautical Engineering from
other public company boards: Since May 2022, Mr. Pedreiro has served on the Board of Eve Holding Inc. (NYSE: EVEX) a subsidiary of Embraer focused on advancing urban air mobility based on electric vertical-takeoff- and- landing vehicles (eVTOLs), and as Chair of the Audit Committee. Mr. Pedreiro previously served on the Board of Estre Ambiental, Inc. (NASDAQ: ESTRF) from January 2012 to March 2021.
director qualifications: Mr. Pedreiro has more than 20 years of experience in executive positions in
board committees: o Audit Committee (Chair) o Compensation Committee
|
Jerome A. Peribere |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Independent Director
director since: 2018 age: 70 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Mr. Peribere retired from Sealed Air Corporation (NYSE: SEE) in December 2017 as President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to becoming President and Chief Executive Officer, he was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Sealed Air. Prior to joining Sealed Air, Mr. Peribere worked at The Dow Chemical Company (NYSE: DOW) from 1977 to 2012. Mr. Peribere served in multiple managerial roles with Dow, including as Executive Vice President of Dow and President and Chief Executive Officer, Dow Advanced Materials, a unit of Dow, from 2010 to 2012. education: Mr. Peribere holds a degree in business economics and finance from the Institut D’Études Politiques in Paris, France. other public company boards: Since May 2013, Mr. Peribere has served on the Board of Xylem Inc. (NYSE: XYL) and as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Peribere previously served on the Board of Sealed Air Corporation (NYSE: SEE) from 2012 to 2017. director qualifications: Mr. Peribere has significant management and chemical industry experience. Mr. Peribere also has extensive experience in the areas of finance, international business operations, safety, environmental compliance, risk oversight and corporate governance. Mr. Peribere is also an expert in accounting and financial reporting and has significant knowledge and experience in accounting, finance and internal control over financial reporting in a public company environment. Mr. Peribere also brings significant experience gained from service on the board of directors of other public companies. board committees: o Governance and Nominating Committee (Chair) o Audit Committee
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 23 |
director nominees
Scott A. Tozier |
|
|
||
principal occupation: Strategic Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of Albemarle Corporation
director since: 2024 age: 58 independent: Yes |
|
professional experience: Scott A. Tozier is the Strategic Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of Albemarle Corporation (NYSE: ALB), a specialty chemicals manufacturing company, a role he has held since 2023. From 2011 to 2023, Mr. Tozier served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Albemarle Corporation. education: Mr. Tozier holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting and Information Systems Analysis and Design from the University of Wisconsin and a Master of Business Administration with an emphasis in Corporate Strategy and Finance from the University of Michigan. other public company boards: Since May 2024, Mr. Tozier has served on the Board of International Paper (NYSE: IP) and as a member of the Audit and Finance Committee and the Public Policy and Environment Committee. Mr. Tozier previously served on the Board of Garrett Motion Inc. (NASDAQ: GTX) and as Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee and a member of the Executive Compensation Committee from October 2018 to April 2021. director qualifications: Mr. Tozier brings significant experience over a 30-year career, in accounting, audit, corporate finance, risk management and executive leadership. board committees: o Environmental, Health, Safety and Quality Committee o Audit Committee
|
24 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
executive officers
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Mr. Willis, age 59, is Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ashland, a position he has held since May 2013. Mr. Willis holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Eastern Kentucky University and a Master of Business Administration from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. |
|
Dr. Osama M. Musa |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
|
|
Dr. Musa, age 56, is Senior Vice President of Ashland, a position he has held since 2018 and Chief Technology Officer, a position he has held since 2016. Dr. Musa holds a Ph.D. in organic chemistry from Wayne State University, where he also completed a post- doctoral fellowship. In addition, he received an M.S. in macromolecular chemistry from the University of Detroit Mercy, an M.S. degree in heterocyclic organic chemistry from the University of Jordan, and a B.S. in chemistry from Yarmouk University in Jordan. |
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Life Sciences and Intermediates |
|
|
Ms. Faccin, age 46, is Senior Vice President and General Manager, Life Sciences and Intermediates of Ashland, a position she has held since June 2024. Prior to joining Ashland, Ms. Faccin served as President, Asia Pacific at Sealed Air Corporation from December 2021 to June 2024. She also served as Vice President, Treasurer from August 2020 to December 2021 and Vice President and General Manager, Product Care North America from January 2018 to July 2020. Ms. Faccin joined Sealed Air Corporation in 2013, and held multiple senior leadership positions, including head of corporate financial planning and analysis. She has also head a variety of positions at Dow Chemical and Rohm and Haas. Ms. Faccin holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Fundação Getúlio Vargas in Brazil, and an Executive Master of Business Administration from Universidade de São Paulo in Brazil. |
|
25 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
executive officers
James P. Minicucci |
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Personal Care |
|
|
Mr. Minicucci, age 42, is Senior Vice President and General Manager, Personal Care of Ashland, a position he has held since April 2024. Previously, Mr. Minicucci served as Senior Vice President, Strategy, Mergers and Acquisitions, and Portfolio Management from May 2023 to May 2024. Previously, Mr. Minicucci served as the Senior Vice President and Global Head Specialty Gasesat MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany from October 2019 to May 2023. Prior to that he served as Vice President and General Manager of Process Materials, Asia at Versum Materials from October 2016 to October 2019. Mr. Minicucci holds a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from Northeastern University. |
|
Dago Caceres |
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Additives |
|
|
Mr. Caceres, age 52, is Senior Vice President and General Manager, Specialty Additives of Ashland, a position he has held since April 2024. Previously, Mr. Caceres served as global strategy director, IFF Pharma Solutions, from February 2021 to April 2024. He served as global strategic marketing leader, DuPont from August 2019 to February 2021. He has also held a variety of leadership positions and has extensive experience working with chemical and science-driven companies, including Dow Chemical, FMC BioPolymer, and Rohm and Hass. Mr. Caceres holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the National University of Colombia and a Master of Business Administration in International Business and Marketing from the Moore Schools of Business at the University of South Carolina. |
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Operations |
|
|
Mr. Bostaph, age 60, is Senior Vice President, Operations of Ashland, a position he has held since August 2023. Previously, Mr. Bostaph served as Vice President, Global Manufacturing and Engineering Ashland from November 2018 to August 2023. He joined Ashland in 2008 and has over 37 years of experience in the chemicals industry. Mr. Bostaph holds a Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry and chemical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. |
|
26 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
executive officers
Robin E. Lampkin |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
Ms. Lampkin, age 61, is Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Ashland, positions she has held since August 2023. Previously, Ms. Lampkin served as Vice President, Associate General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer from January 2021 to August 2023. Prior to that, Ms. Lampkin served as Assistant General Counsel for Ashland’s Environmental, Product Regulatory, Trade and Governmental Affairs from January 2019 to January 2021. Ms. Lampkin joined Ashland in 1991 and during her 32-year tenure has held multiple leadership roles and has been active in tort litigation and global environmental regulatory and remediation. Ms. Lampkin holds a Bachelor of Arts in Criminology and a Juris Doctorate from Ohio State University. |
|
Eileen Drury |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer |
|
|
Ms. Drury, age 56, is Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Ashland, a position she has held since November 2021. Previously, Ms. Drury held multiple leadership roles at Ashland, including Vice President Human Resources from August 2020 to November 2021 and Director, Human Resources from April 2019 to August 2020. Ms. Drury also served as an HR Business Partner for various groups within Ashland from 2011 to 2019. Ms. Drury holds a Master of Arts in Business Administration and Management and a Bachelor of Arts from Fairleigh Dickinson University. |
|
Eric N. Boni |
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
Mr. Boni, age 55, is Vice President, Finance and Principal Accounting Officer of Ashland, a position he has held since January 2020. Previously, Mr. Boni served as Vice President, Finance from January 2019 to January 2020 and Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from September 2016 to January 2019. Mr. Boni holds a Bachelor of Science degree in finance from Miami (Ohio) University and a Master of Business Administration in finance and decision and information systems from Indiana University. |
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 27 |
compensation discussion and analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy and programs and the compensation decisions made by the Compensation Committee under those programs. This CD&A focuses on the compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”) for fiscal 2024, who were:
Name |
|
Title |
Guillermo Novo |
|
Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) |
J. Kevin Willis |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) |
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
Senior Vice President and GM, Life Sciences and Intermediates |
Dr. Osama M. Musa |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer |
Karl Bostaph |
|
Senior Vice President Operations & Manufacturing |
Min S. Chong(1) |
|
Former, Senior Vice President and GM Personal Care and Specialty Additives |
fiscal year 2024 performance highlights and financial results
Key financial results for fiscal 2024 include:
(1) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is reconciled to net income in Appendix A.
In fiscal 2024, Ashland continued to experience a difficult operating environment. Markets did not recover to the levels anticipated at the beginning of the year and our full-year results reflected the widely discussed short-to-medium-term industry and macroeconomic challenges (including economic volatility, political instability and more) faced by Ashland’s commercial segments. Despite these challenges, overall Adjusted EBITDA remained flat with the prior year as the Ashland team successfully managed through market fluctuations, economic volatility, political instability and proactively took actions to manage production and reduce inventory levels, and drive stronger free cash flow generation versus the prior fiscal year.
As a result, Ashland achieved moderate success towards performance outcomes for the fiscal year 2024 annual incentive plan but did not meet some of the desired results for long-term performance grants with performance periods ending in 2024, with significantly reduced incentives earned under that program.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 28 |
compensation discussion and analysis
These outcomes reflect our Compensation Committee’s commitment to designing an executive compensation program that aligns NEO compensation with Company performance and results for our stockholders.
(In millions) $ |
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Science |
|
|
$810 |
|
|
|
$869 |
|
|
|
$815 |
Personal Care |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
678 |
Specialty Additives |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
719 |
Intermediates |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
256 |
Intersegment sales |
|
|
(47) |
|
|
|
(61) |
|
|
|
(77) |
|
|
|
$2,114 |
|
|
|
$2,191 |
|
|
|
$2,391 |
Operating Income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences |
|
|
$168 |
|
|
|
$172 |
|
|
|
$155 |
Personal Care |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
102 |
Specialty Additives |
|
|
(32) |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
103 |
Intermediates |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
87 |
Unallocated and other |
|
|
(264) |
|
|
|
(112) |
|
|
|
(114) |
|
|
|
$(26) |
|
|
|
$172 |
|
|
|
$333 |
EBITDA(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences |
|
|
$229 |
|
|
|
$241 |
|
|
|
$218 |
Personal Care |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
186 |
Specialty Additives |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
184 |
Intermediates |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
100 |
Unallocated and other(2) |
|
|
(264) |
|
|
|
(112) |
|
|
|
(114) |
|
|
|
$248 |
|
|
|
$415 |
|
|
|
$574 |
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences |
|
|
$230 |
|
|
|
$247 |
|
|
|
$218 |
Personal Care |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
186 |
Specialty Additives |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
185 |
Intermediates |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
100 |
Unallocated and other |
|
|
(76) |
|
|
|
(82) |
|
|
|
(99) |
|
|
|
$459 |
|
|
|
$459 |
|
|
|
$590 |
(1) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures and are reconciled to net income for Ashland and operating income for each business unit in Appendix A.
(2) Excludes income (loss) from discontinuing operations and other net periodic benefit loss (income).
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 29 |
compensation discussion and analysis
compensation philosophy
Our executive compensation program is designed to create a pay-for-performance culture by aligning compensation to the achievement of our financial and strategic objectives and our stockholders’ interests. We strive to provide our NEOs with a compensation package that is aligned with our Compensation Peer Group (as defined below), with the expectation, based on a comparison to executives in the Compensation Peer Group and a review of other competitive market information, that above-target performance will result in above-median pay and below-target performance will result in below-median pay. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salaries and the annual and long-term target incentive opportunities of our NEOs to determine whether these programs competitively reward our NEOs for their services.
The primary objectives of our executive compensation program and the guiding principles for setting and awarding executive compensation are to:
Align the interests of management with our stockholders |
|
To closely align the interests of management with the interests of our stockholders, a significant portion of each executive’s compensation is equity-based and is linked to building long-term stockholder value through the achievement of Ashland's financial and strategic objectives. |
Provide incentive compensation that promotes desired behavior without encouraging unnecessary and excessive risk |
|
Incentive compensation should help drive business strategy. The compensation program should encourage both the desired results and the right behaviors. It should help drive business strategy and strike a balance between short-term and long-term performance, while incorporating risk-mitigating design features so that unnecessary or excessive risk is not encouraged. |
Attract, retain and motivate executive talent by providing competitive levels of salary and target total pay |
|
Compensation should be competitive with those organizations with which we compete for top talent and attract and retain executive officers with the skills, experience and motivation to achieve stated Company objectives. |
Integrate with our performance management process of goal-setting and formal evaluation |
|
Target-level goals should be aligned with the annual operating plan and be considered stretch yet achievable, based on an annual assessment of business conditions for the performance period. |
30 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
compensation discussion and analysis
compensation governance practices
Our Compensation Committee intends to compensate our NEOs consistent with the objectives and design principles previously outlined. We have adopted the following compensation practices, which are intended to promote strong corporate governance and alignment with stockholder interests:
Independence of Committee Members |
|
The Compensation Committee members satisfy both the NYSE’s general independence standards for directors as well as its heightened standards for service on a Compensation Committee, are “non-employee directors” under SEC rules and satisfy the requirements of an “outside director” for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). |
Independent Compensation Consultant |
|
The Compensation Committee retains and annually reviews the independence of its compensation consultant. |
Annual Risk Assessment |
|
The Compensation Committee conducts an annual risk assessment of our executives, management, and designs plans and programs to ensure they are aligned with our compensation philosophy and do not encourage excessive risk taking. |
Compensation at Risk |
|
We grant a high percentage of at-risk compensation. We believe this is essential to creating a pay-for-performance culture. |
Stock Ownership Guidelines |
|
Our guidelines require executive officers to maintain an amount of equity equal to a multiple of base salary: (i) five times base salary for the CEO and (ii) three times base salary for all other Section 16 officers. Each officer is expected to achieve compliance with the guidelines by the fifth anniversary of the executive officer’s appointment. |
Clawback Policy |
|
Our Board of Directors has adopted a clawback policy in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange requirements, to recoup “excess” incentive compensation, if any, earned by current and former executive officers during a three year look back period in the event of a financial restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws (with no fault required) or for other fraud, material misrepresentation; material financial, reputational, or other harm; willful and material violations of code of conduct or other such policies; violation of restrictive covenants/agreements or other reasons for termination for cause. |
Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy |
|
We prohibit our executive officers from hedging or pledging Ashland securities. |
“Double triggers” in Change in Control Agreements and Salary Continuation Plan |
|
The NEOs and other executive officers do not receive change in control cash severance unless their employment is terminated without cause (or by the executive for good reason) within a specified period following a change in control. |
No Tax Gross-Ups on Change in Control Benefits |
|
The NEOs and other executive officers are not entitled to tax gross ups in the event their change in control benefits are subject to “golden parachute” excise taxes under Section 280G of the Code. |
Equity Incentive Compensation Plan Best Practices |
|
Our Ashland Global Holdings Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan includes many best practices for equity compensation programs, such as minimum vesting periods and the absence of single-trigger vesting. |
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 31 |
compensation discussion and analysis
elements of compensation and link to company performance
primary compensation elements
We provide both fixed (salary) and variable (cash and equity incentive) compensation to our NEOs. The following table sets forth information regarding each of the three core elements of compensation for our NEOs in 2024, including a description of each element.
Compensation Element |
|
Description |
Base Salary |
|
Fixed cash compensation based on each executive officer’s role, responsibilities, competitive market positioning, and individual performance. |
Annual Incentive |
|
Annual performance-based incentive cash compensation with target award amounts for each executive officer. Actual bonus amounts may be higher or lower than target based on the achievement of certain Company performance goals and individual performance. |
Long-Term Incentive |
|
Long-term incentives delivered through a blend of Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) and Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). Actual performance incentive amounts may be higher or lower than target based on the achievement of certain Company performance goals. |
The majority of our NEOs’ compensation is performance-based and not guaranteed. The following table summarizes the key elements of our executive compensation program and describes why each element is provided:
|
|
Base Salary |
|
Annual Incentive |
|
PSUs |
|
RSUs |
Recipient |
|
All NEOs |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
When Granted / Received or Reviewed |
|
Reviewed annually |
|
Annually for prior year performance |
|
First quarter annually |
||
|
|
|
||||||
Form of Delivery |
|
Cash |
|
Equity |
||||
|
|
|
||||||
Type of Performance |
|
Short-term emphasis |
|
Long-term emphasis |
||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Performance Period |
|
Ongoing |
|
1 Year |
|
3 Years |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
How Payout is Determined |
|
Compensation Committee judgment based on review of market and other factors |
|
Formulaic; Compensation Committee verifies performance before payout |
|
Formulaic; Compensation Committee verifies performance before payout |
|
Stock price on vest date |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Most Recent Performance Measure |
|
N/A |
|
Adjusted EBITDA, Portfolio Restructuring |
|
Return on Net Assets (“RONA”)(1) and relative Total Shareholder Return (“rTSR”) |
|
Stock price appreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
What is Incentivized |
|
Balance against excessive risk taking |
|
Deliver on annual strategic objectives |
|
Deliver on long-term strategic objectives; outperform peers |
|
Balance against excessive risk-taking and retention |
32 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
compensation discussion and analysis
overall pay mix
As illustrated in the charts below, we place a significant emphasis on performance-based compensation (annual and long-term) so that a substantial percentage of each NEO’s total direct target compensation is contingent on the successful achievement of our financial and strategic goals, in accordance with our compensation philosophy.
total direct compensation mix
fiscal year 2024 compensation structure decisions
Our Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries and the annual and long-term target opportunities of our NEOs annually to determine whether these programs competitively reward our NEOs for their services based on a comparison to executives in the Compensation Peer Group and a review of other competitive market information.
base salary
The Compensation Committee considers each NEO’s experience, proficiency, performance and potential to impact future business results, the NEO’s behavior measured against key competencies and corporate values and competitiveness in the market, in making base salary decisions.
The Compensation Committee also reviewed the market data provided by its independent compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, in connection with the compensation recommendations submitted by Mr. Novo for each NEO other than himself. The Compensation Committee increased the base salaries Messrs. Bostaph and Chong to recognize their additional responsibilities received during the fiscal year.
Base salaries, effective January 2024 (and for Ms. Faccin, June 2024 in connection with her hire) are as follows:
NEO |
|
2023 Base Salary |
|
2024 Base Salary |
|
Change |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
1,128,500 |
|
|
|
1,128,500 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
630,270 |
|
|
|
630,270 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
|
509,430 |
|
|
|
509,430 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Karl Bostaph (1) |
|
|
360,390 |
|
|
|
396,430 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Min S. Chong (2) |
|
|
447,280 |
|
|
|
492,010 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 33 |
compensation discussion and analysis
annual and long-term incentive target opportunities
Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the annual and long-term incentive target opportunities to ensure alignment with our compensation philosophy and competitive practice.
fiscal year 2024 incentive plan designs and performance-related payouts
annual and long-term incentive metrics and goals
Based on a review of the annual and long-term financial goals, operational plans, strategic initiatives and the prior year’s actual results, the Compensation Committee annually approves the financial performance metrics that will be used to measure performance in our annual and long-term incentive arrangements as well as the relative weighting that will be assigned to each metric. The Compensation Committee then approves threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance metric. The Compensation Committee seeks to establish corporate performance goals that are challenging yet attainable.
For our fiscal 2024 Annual Incentive Plan (“Annual Incentive Plan”) and Long-Term Incentive Performance Plan (“LTIPP”), the Compensation Committee approved the following performance metrics in November 2023 for the reasons noted below:
|
|
Performance Metric |
|
Reason for Selection |
|
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”)(1) |
|
An indicator of Ashland’s • Profitability • Ability to optimize cash flow and stockholder value |
|
|
Innovation Revenue(1) |
|
• An important measurement of Ashland’s ability to generate revenue from new products introduced |
|
|
Portfolio Restructuring |
|
• Focus on strategic restructuring efforts to ensure product portfolio aligned with strategic direction |
|
|
Environmental Health and Safety • Total Preventable Recordable Rate (“TPRR”) • Process Safety (“PSI”) • Spills and Releases (“EIC”) • Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) |
|
• Reflects the importance of environmental, social, governance and safety matters within Ashland |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Net Assets (“RONA”)(1) |
|
• Measures results of capital allocation decisions |
|
|
Relative Total Shareholder Return (“rTSR”) |
|
• Measures performance against our Performance Peer Group and stockholder value creation |
adjustments to reported financial results
The Compensation Committee reviews our financial performance following the end of the fiscal year and determines the financial performance score. The Compensation Committee retains the authority to make adjustments to our reported financial results for items causing significant differences from assumptions contained in our annual operating plan which could include among other items certain environmental reserves, restructuring and severance costs for significant business model redesign events, unrealized gain on securities, accelerated amortization of debt issuance costs, debt financing costs, uncertain tax positions, other tax reform related activities and use of a constant foreign exchange rate (see appendix A). The Compensation Committee has adopted a set of guidelines to help it evaluate potential adjustments. Adjustments to reported financial results are intended to better reflect executives’ line of
34 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
compensation discussion and analysis
sight and ability to affect performance results, align award payments with decisions that support the annual operating plan, avoid artificial inflation or deflation of awards due to unusual or non-recurring items in the applicable period and emphasize long-term and sustainable growth.
fiscal year 2024 annual incentive plan design
For fiscal 2024, the NEOs, including the CEO, participated in the Annual Incentive Plan, which is designed to reward executives for the achievement of EBITDA growth, restructuring our portfolio and for delivering value through new product sales “Innovation Revenue” with an additional Environmental, Health and Safety (“EH&S”) modifier of up to +/- 10% of the target incentive.
NEO |
Adjusted |
Innovation |
Adjusted |
Portfolio Optimization |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Min S. Chong(1) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Alesandra Faccin Assis (2) |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
All Other NEOs |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
The fiscal 2024 goals for each metric were established as indicated below:
Corporate |
Adjusted |
Adjusted |
Innovation |
Innovation |
|
Portfolio Optimization EBITDA ($, millions) |
|
Portfolio Optimization Payout Curve (%) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Threshold |
|
|
383.8 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Target |
|
|
479.7 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
575.6 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Life Sciences and Intermediates (1)(2) |
Life Sciences Adjusted |
|
Life Sciences Adjusted |
|
Innovation Revenue Sales ($, millions) |
Innovation |
Portfolio Optimization EBITDA ($, millions) |
Portfolio Optimization Payout Curve (%) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Threshold |
|
|
229.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
287.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
344.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 35 |
compensation discussion and analysis
The named executive officers were also evaluated for performance against the EH&S metrics. Performance against the EH&S metrics may increase (or decrease) an executive’s annual incentive payout, calculated as described above, by up to 10% plus or minus the executive’s target bonus. However, the EH&S modifier may not increase the total annual incentive paid to any executive beyond 200% of target. For fiscal 2024, the Compensation Committee set EH&S targets in three areas with a fourth discretionary adjustment for sustainability, as described in the following table:
Metric |
Corporate |
Life Sciences and Intermediates FY2024 Target |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ashland (TPRR) |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
Ashland (Process Safety—PSI) |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
Ashland (Spills and Releases—EIC) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Using performance against goals as the starting point, the Compensation Committee uses its discretion when determining the modifier for an individual, team or Business Unit to reflect more closely:
fiscal year 2024 annual incentive performance
The table below shows the adjusted fiscal 2024 performance compared to the pre-established financial performance targets for Ashland Inc. and our Life Sciences and Intermediates business unit. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, when achievement is above or below target, compensation is also above or below target as illustrated below.
Corporate |
Weighting |
Target |
Committee Adjusted |
Payout |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted Company EBITDA |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
479.7 |
|
|
|
|
454.2 |
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
Innovation Revenue |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
Portfolio Optimization |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
EH&S Modifier |
modifier |
|
varies |
|
|
|
varies |
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
||||||
Combined Weighted Payout (% of Target) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
Life Sciences & Intermediates |
Weighting |
Target |
Committee |
Payout |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted Business Unit EBITDA |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
287.1 |
|
|
|
|
255.9 |
|
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
Adjusted Company EBITDA |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
479.7 |
|
|
|
|
454.2 |
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
Innovation Revenue |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
Portfolio Optimization |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
EH&S Modifier |
modifier |
|
varies |
|
|
|
varies |
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
||||||
Combined Weighted Payout (% of Target) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
36 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
compensation discussion and analysis
fiscal year 2024 annual incentive payout
Based on the performance outlined above, the Compensation Committee approved the following annual incentive payouts for the NEOs:
NEO |
Annual Incentive Target ($) |
Annual |
EH&S Modifier |
Annual Incentive Actual Payout ($) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Guillermo Novo |
|
1,410,625 |
|
|
|
|
104.8 |
% |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
1,477,772 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
567,243 |
|
|
|
|
104.8 |
% |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
594,245 |
|
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
318,500 |
|
|
|
|
98.1 |
% |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
96,487 |
|
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
382,073 |
|
|
|
|
104.8 |
% |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
400,260 |
|
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
257,680 |
|
|
|
|
104.8 |
% |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
269,946 |
|
|
Min S. Chong (1) |
|
319,807 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
fiscal year 2024 equity grants
We typically grant annual equity awards during the first quarter of each fiscal year. The equity grant date is never selected or changed to result in a more favorable value of equity awards for executives. The Compensation Committee approved the annual grants shown in the table below during the first quarter of fiscal 2024.
NEO |
Aggregate Target |
|
Aggregate Target |
|
Target |
|
Target |
|
Target RSU |
|
Target RSU |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Guillermo Novo(2) |
|
|
443 |
% |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
39,396 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
26,264 |
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
225 |
% |
|
|
1,418,108 |
|
|
|
709,054 |
|
|
|
9,311 |
|
|
|
709,054 |
|
|
|
9,311 |
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis(3) |
|
|
150 |
% |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|||||
Osama M. Musa |
|
|
150 |
% |
|
|
764,145 |
|
|
|
382,073 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
382,073 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
396,430 |
|
|
|
198,215 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
198,215 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
Min S. Chong |
|
|
150 |
% |
|
|
738,015 |
|
|
|
369,008 |
|
|
|
4,846 |
|
|
|
369,008 |
|
|
|
4,846 |
|
fiscal year 2024-2026 PSU design
Our Long-Term Incentive Performance Plan (“LTIPP”) for our NEOs in fiscal 2024 was composed of 50% in the form of PSUs and 50% in the form of RSUs. This change in mix from 60% PSUs and 40% RSUs was made for 2024 only in recognition of a challenging market environment and unclear forecast at the time of grant. We grant executives a mix of equity award types to provide an effective balance between rewarding our NEOs for strong corporate performance and encouraging NEO retention. This design enhances the alignment of the executives’ interests and long-term strategies with those of our stockholders. LTIPP targets are expressed as a percentage of base salary and, in the case of PSUs and RSUs, the number of units awarded is determined by dividing the amount of the LTIPP target by the closing price of Ashland Common Stock on the grant date and rounding down to the nearest whole share.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 37 |
compensation discussion and analysis
performance stock units (“PSUs”)
PSUs are designed to reward executives for achieving long-term performance that meets or exceeds pre-established performance metrics. PSUs vest in full at the end of the three-year performance period and the number of PSUs that can be earned by the NEOs depends upon the level of achievement against the pre-established performance metrics at the end of the performance period. PSUs issued prior to September 2024 are not entitled to receive dividend equivalents or to receive cash dividends during the performance period. After September 2024, dividend equivalents on PSUs are accumulated but only become payable if the underlying PSU vests. At the time of vesting, one share of Ashland Common Stock is issued for each PSU and any accrued dividend equivalents that were declared during the performance period.
restricted stock units (“RSUs”)
RSUs provide strong retentive value, while still providing alignment with stockholder value creation. Our annual RSU grants generally vest in equal installments on each anniversary of the date of grant over a three-year period. Dividend equivalents are accrued on outstanding RSUs at the same time and at the same rate as dividends are paid to stockholders. Dividend equivalents on RSUs are accumulated but only become payable if the underlying RSU vests. At the time of vesting, one share of Ashland Common Stock is issued for each RSU and any accrued dividend equivalents.
Our annual RSU grants generally vest in equal installments on each anniversary of the date of grant over a three-year period. Dividend equivalents are accrued on outstanding RSUs at the same time and at the same rate as dividends are paid to stockholders. Dividend equivalents on RSUs are accumulated but only become payable if the underlying RSU vests. At the time of vesting, one share of Ashland Common Stock is issued for each RSU and any accrued dividend equivalents.
In November 2023, the Compensation Committee reviewed and approved the performance metrics and target performance levels for the PSUs covering a performance period beginning October 1, 2023 and ending September 30, 2026 (the “2024-2026 PSUs”).
The structure for the 2024-2026 PSUs remains unchanged from prior programs and will be measured based on achievement against adjusted Return on Net Assets (“RONA”) and relative total stockholder return (“rTSR”) at the end of the performance period. Fifty percent (50%) of the PSUs will be earned based on the average of each fiscal year RONA final performance. Fifty percent (50%) of the PSUs will be earned based on Ashland’s rTSR performance versus the S&P400 at the end of fiscal year 2026. Depending on the level of performance against the RONA and rTSR metrics, NEOs can earn from 0% of the target number of PSUs to up to 200% of the target number of PSUs for above target performance.
Target performance against the rTSR metric is achieved for rTSR at the 50th percentile of the peer group. Due to the competitive sensitivity and the forward-looking nature of the RONA measure, Ashland does not disclose the target for the RONA metric for in-progress PSU programs. The Compensation Committee nonetheless views the RONA performance targets for the 2024-2026 PSUs as challenging to achieve and subject to performance risk. The RONA targets for the 2024-2026 PSUs will be disclosed in a future Ashland proxy statement reporting NEO compensation for the year in which the award has been earned.
fiscal year 2022-2024 PSUs performance results and payouts
In November 2021, the Compensation Committee established a three-year performance share unit program, covering a measurement period from October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2024 (the “2022-2024 PSUs”). The 2022-2024 PSUs could be earned based on achievement against two weighted performance metrics - RONA and rTSR.
The following table shows the performance objectives for each performance metric measured for the 2022-2024 PSUs, Ashland’s actual performance against those metrics, and the resulting payout as a percentage of the target performance:
38 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
compensation discussion and analysis
RONA and rTSR |
|
Weighting |
|
Target |
|
Adjusted |
|
Payout |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
RONA |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
rTSR |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
Combined Weighted Payout (% of Target) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
Based on the level of achievement against the performance metrics certified by the Compensation Committee in November 2024, the NEOs achieved 38.6% of target performance due to underachievement against the RONA and rTSR metrics. The following table provides, for each NEO, the number of 2022-2024 PSUs granted and the number and value of the 2022-2024 PSUs earned for the fiscal 2022-2024 performance period:
NEO |
|
Number of |
|
Award |
|
Number of |
|
Payout Amount |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
11,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
854,751 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
|
9,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
268,524 |
|
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis (2) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
% |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
144,684 |
|
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,172 |
|
|
Min S. Chong (3) |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
94,434 |
|
|
other compensation elements
retirement benefits
Ashland offers NEOs a combination of tax-qualified and non-qualified retirement plans that are designed to assist the NEOs in building savings for retirement over the term of their employment. A summary of our various plans is listed below.
The Company’s Employee Savings Plan is a tax-qualified vehicle which provides retirement benefits to the NEOs and their families. The benefits in this plan are available to most U.S.-based employees. The Company contributions, 4% match and base contribution of 4%, are funded to an external trust and are separate from the assets of Ashland and by law are protected from Ashland’s creditors.
The benefits that may be provided under the tax-qualified plan are limited by the IRS. This plan, standing alone, does not provide sufficient retirement income to the NEOs when compared to their pay as an active employee. To make up for this gap in potential replacement income in retirement, Ashland offers the NEOs non-qualified retirement plans that complement each other and the tax-qualified plan (non-qualified defined contribution plan and voluntary employee deferral plan).
Ashland has an unfunded, non-qualified defined contribution plan that provides a company contribution equivalent to a base contribution of 4% and a Company match of 4% on annual incentive compensation paid and eligible earnings in excess of limits established under Code Section 401(a)(17) not permitted in the Employee Savings Plan.
Ashland also has employee deferral plans that allow the NEOs to annually make a separate deferral election so that the NEOs and other senior leaders can save amounts from their own pay in addition to amounts they are allowed to save in the Employee Savings Plan.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 39 |
compensation discussion and analysis
For a description of these plans, see the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” section on page 50 of this Proxy Statement.
NEOs are also offered other benefits the same as other U.S.-based employees.
executive perquisites
Ashland provides the NEOs and other selected executives with financial planning services (including tax preparation) and reimbursement for an annual executive physical. Each NEO also participates in various health and welfare programs, in each case, on the same terms (including with respect to premiums paid and Company contributions) as are available to Ashland employees generally.
The Compensation Committee reviews the perquisites provided to executive officers as part of its overall review of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has determined the perquisites serve a useful business purpose, as such expenditures allow the executives to be more effective in their duties and the types and amounts are well within the appropriate range of market practices. A detailed description of the cost of these perquisites is included in the “Summary Compensation Table” section of this Proxy Statement.
senior leadership severance plan
In August 2021, the Committee approved a Senior Leadership Severance Plan for U.S. executive officers and certain senior leaders (the “Senior Leadership Severance Plan”) designed to provide for financial protection to certain key executives of the Company in the event of unexpected job loss (whether before or in connection with a Change in Control), in order to encourage the continued attention of Participants who are expected to make substantial contributions to the success of the Company and thereby provide for stability and continuity of management. The Senior Leadership Severance Plan provides certain benefits in the event of a qualified termination with and without a change in control. A qualified termination means any termination of a Participant’s employment: (i) at any time other than during the Change in Control Protection Period, by the Company without Cause (and not as a result of the Participant’s disability or death); or (ii) solely during the Change in Control Protection Period, by the Company without Cause (and not as a result of the Participant’s disability or death), or by the Participant for Good Reason. The plan does not provide benefits in the event of a termination for cause or a voluntary resignation.
Under the Senior Leadership Severance Plan, in the event of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason within two years after a change in control and not otherwise covered by a change in control agreement, certain benefits will be paid as follows:
A detailed description of this plan is included in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section on page 51 of this Proxy Statement.
change in control agreements
Messrs. Novo and Willis have entered into a change in control agreement that sets forth the economic consequences and entitlements for a termination without cause or for good reason after a change in
40 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
compensation discussion and analysis
control. The primary purpose of these agreements is to align executive and stockholder interests by enabling the executives to assess possible corporate transactions without regard to the effect such transactions could have on their employment.
A detailed description of these agreements is included in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section on page 51 of this Proxy Statement.
compensation setting process
role of stockholder say-on-pay votes
The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the philosophy, objectives and elements of our executive compensation programs in relation to our short- and long-term business objectives. In undertaking this review, the Compensation Committee considers the views of stockholders as reflected in their annual advisory vote on our executive compensation proposal. At our 2024 Annual Meeting, stockholders approved our executive compensation proposal by an overwhelming majority (approximately 99%). Based on the Compensation Committee’s review and the support of our executive compensation programs received from stockholders, the Compensation Committee maintained the core elements of our executive compensation programs in fiscal 2024.
role of the compensation committee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for the approval and administration of compensation programs for executive officers and certain other employees of Ashland. The Compensation Committee frequently reviews Ashland’s compensation practices and considers, among other things: Ashland’s compensation philosophy, its financial and operating performance, individual performance, practices and compensation levels of peer companies and the voting guidelines of certain proxy advisory firms and stockholders. In making compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee uses several resources and tools, including competitive market information, and reviews accumulated and potential equity holdings.
When making individual recommendations to the Compensation Committee for NEOs other than himself with respect to base salary, annual incentive and long-term compensation, the CEO considers the relative importance of the executive’s position within the organization, individual tenure and experience, individual performance and the contributions to Ashland’s financial and operating results.
role of management
Management also plays an important role in the process of setting compensation for executives other than the CEO. The CEO, and in certain instances other executives, in consultation with the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and human resources, develops compensation recommendations for the Compensation Committee’s consideration.
role of the independent compensation committee consultant
In July 2020, the Compensation Committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as its consultant, which continued throughout 2024. Meridian is independent under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and does not provide any other non-executive compensation related work for Ashland. During 2024, Meridian assisted the Compensation Committee with various activities related to benchmarking and advising on executive compensation matters.
compensation comparator peer group
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 41 |
compensation discussion and analysis
The Compensation Committee primarily uses two comparator groups as part of its executive compensation process. The “Compensation Peer Group” is used to assess the competitiveness of our NEO’s compensation and the “Performance Peer Group” is used to evaluate our stock performance.
compensation peer group
The Compensation Committee considers relevant market pay practices, among other factors, when setting executive compensation to enhance our ability to recruit and retain high-performing talent. In assessing market competitiveness, the compensation of our NEOs is reviewed against executive compensation at a number of companies with which we compete for executive talent. Factors used to determine the companies included in the analysis and how the data is used is set forth below:
Considerations used to choose peer group |
|
ü |
Comparable revenue size |
ü |
Global operations |
ü |
Industry |
ü |
Business Model |
ü |
Market Capitalization |
How we use peer group information |
|
ü |
Input in developing base salary ranges, annual incentive target opportunities and long-term incentive awards |
ü |
Assess competitiveness of total direct compensation |
ü |
Determine form and mix of equity |
ü |
Input to designing compensation plans, benefits and perquisites |
The Compensation Peer Group is annually reviewed by the Compensation Committee, with support from its independent compensation consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners. During the review, the Compensation Committee considers whether the Compensation Peer Group companies remain appropriate from a business and talent perspective.
2024 compensation peer group
|
Ø |
Albemarle Corporation |
|
Ø |
FMC Corporation |
|
Ø |
Quaker Chemical |
|
Ø |
Avient Corporation |
|
Ø |
H.B. Fuller Company |
|
Ø |
RPM International Inc. |
|
Ø |
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd |
|
Ø |
Ingevity Corporation |
|
Ø |
Sensient Technologies Corporation |
|
Ø |
Cabot Corporation |
|
Ø |
Innospec Inc. |
|
Ø |
Stepan Corporation |
|
Ø |
Element Solutions, Inc. |
|
Ø |
Minerals Technologies |
|
Ø |
The Chemours Company |
|
Ø |
Entegris, Inc. |
|
Ø |
New Market Corporation |
|
|
|
Additionally, competitive pay data was gathered from the Equilar 2023 Executive Compensation Survey. The data from the survey is scoped to Ashland’s industry and adjusted to Ashland’s revenue size.
performance peer group
In fiscal 2024 the Compensation Committee utilized the entire S&P 400 index as our performance peer group (the “Performance Peer Group”). We believed the Performance Peer Group was an appropriate measure of our rTSR, reflecting Ashland’s performance compared to the broader stock market and provides transparency to our investors and incentive plan participants. Our Performance Peer Group is used solely for assessing rTSR performance for our PSUs.
42 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
compensation discussion and analysis
additional compensation information and tax matters
policies regarding stock ownership
We currently have Stock Ownership Guidelines (“Guidelines”) for our executive officers and other key executives as designated by the Compensation Committee. The purpose of these Guidelines is to align the interests of our executives with the interests of our stockholders within 5 years of appointment as a Section 16 Officer. Ownership includes stock actually owned by each executive officer, a family member, within a retirement plan, shares held in trust, or deferred shares. The current Guidelines as determined by the Compensation Committee are noted below:
Role |
Stock Ownership Requirements |
Chief Executive Officer |
Ownership equal to 5 times base salary |
Chief Financial Officer and Other Section 16 Officers |
Ownership equal to 3 times base salary |
policy regarding employee, officer and director hedging and pledging
Under Ashland’s Securities Laws and Insider Trading Policy, directors, officers, employees and certain persons or entities related to these individuals, are prohibited from purchasing any financial instruments that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities of Ashland granted to or held by such covered persons. Such financial instruments include, but are not limited to, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds.
Additionally, all directors and officers of Ashland are prohibited from, directly or indirectly, pledging equity securities of Ashland. Pledging includes, but is not limited to, the creation of any form of pledge, security interest, deposit, lien or other hypothecation, including the holding of shares in a margin account.
clawback policy
In October 2023, the Board approved updates to Ashland's clawback policy in compliance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. Under the clawback policy, Ashland may recoup “excess” incentive compensation, if any, earned by current and former executive officers during a three year look back period in the event of a financial restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws (with no fault required). Additionally, in September 2024, Ashland adopted a supplemental recoupment policy for all employees permitting the recovery of “excess” incentive compensation in the event of accounting restatement from non-executives, and from all employees in other circumstances including: a manifest error in the payment of incentive compensation to the employee; the employee’s fraud or material misrepresentation directed at or impacting Ashland; acts that cause material financial, reputational, or other harm to Ashland; the employee’s willful and material violations of Ashland’s code of conduct or other policies; violations by the employee of any employment or restrictive covenants agreements; or acts for which the employee has been terminated from Ashland for cause.
tax and accounting implications of compensation
Compensation paid to any of our named executive officers generally will not be deductible, to the extent that it exceeds $1 million per year. Generally, under GAAP, compensation is expensed as earned. Equity compensation is expensed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, which is generally over the vesting period.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 43 |
compensation committee report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement and discussed it with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Ashland’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2024 and Ashland’s Proxy Statement for its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This report is provided by the following independent directors who comprise the Compensation Committee:
compensation committee
Suzan F. Harrison, Chair
Steven D. Bishop
Ashish Kulkarni Ph.D.
Sergio Pedreiro
Janice J. Teal
The Compensation Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Ashland specifically incorporates the Compensation Committee Report by reference.
44 / ashland.com 2025 |
|
|
fiscal 2024 executive compensation tables
summary compensation table
The following table summarizes the compensation of the Company’s CEO, CFO, the three other most highly compensated executive officers, and certain other former executive officers for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022:
Name and Principal Position(1) |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
Bonus |
Stock |
Non-Equity |
|
Change in Pension |
|
All Other |
|
Total |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guillermo Novo |
|
2024 |
|
|
1,128,500 |
|
|
— |
|
|
6,242,771 |
|
|
1,477,772 |
|
|
— |
|
|
132,948 |
|
|
|
8,981,991 |
|
Chair and Chief |
|
2023 |
|
|
1,114,805 |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,454,895 |
|
|
101,565 |
|
|
— |
|
|
286,649 |
|
|
|
6,957,914 |
|
Executive Officer |
|
2022 |
|
|
1,088,525 |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,813,052 |
|
|
2,202,217 |
|
|
— |
|
|
213,408 |
|
|
|
9,317,202 |
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
2024 |
|
|
630,270 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,759,077 |
|
|
594,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
75,556 |
|
|
|
3,059,148 |
|
SVP, Chief |
|
2023 |
|
|
624,974 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,611,560 |
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
133,300 |
|
|
|
2,412,378 |
|
Financial Officer |
|
2022 |
|
|
607,941 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,826,148 |
|
|
922,455 |
|
|
(686,200) |
|
|
100,100 |
|
|
|
2,770,444 |
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis (6) |
|
2024 |
|
|
131,923 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
1,439,918 |
|
|
96,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
252,119 |
|
|
|
2,010,447 |
|
SVP & GM Life Sciences & Intermediates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
2024 |
|
|
509,430 |
|
|
— |
|
|
947,789 |
|
|
400,260 |
|
|
— |
|
|
65,188 |
|
|
|
1,922,667 |
|
SVP, Chief |
|
2023 |
|
|
505,150 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,668,341 |
|
|
28,656 |
|
|
— |
|
|
96,770 |
|
|
|
2,298,917 |
|
Technology Officer |
|
2022 |
|
|
494,596 |
|
|
— |
|
|
983,987 |
|
|
621,336 |
|
|
— |
|
|
82,168 |
|
|
|
2,182,087 |
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
2024 |
|
|
387,420 |
|
|
— |
|
|
491,685 |
|
|
269,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
462,145 |
|
|
|
1,611,196 |
|
SVP Operations and Manufacturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Min S. Chong |
|
2024 |
|
|
350,427 |
|
|
— |
|
|
915,356 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,001,516 |
|
|
|
2,267,299 |
|
Former SVP, GM Specialty |
|
2023 |
|
|
442,198 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,557,107 |
|
|
20,128 |
|
|
— |
|
|
84,589 |
|
|
|
2,104,022 |
|
Additives & Personal Care |
|
2022 |
|
|
426,874 |
|
|
— |
|
|
786,349 |
|
|
431,809 |
|
|
— |
|
|
74,665 |
|
|
|
1,719,697 |
|
The grant date fair values of the PSU awards made during fiscal 2024 assuming the maximum level of performance are as follows: Mr. Novo, $7,685,807; Mr. Willis, $1,816,506; Dr. Musa, $978,732; Mr. Bostaph $507,737, and Mr. Chong, $945,240.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 45 |
2024 executive compensation tables
Name |
|
Perquisites(a) |
|
Matching |
|
Matching |
|
Severance(b) |
Other |
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
|
28,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
69,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,641 |
|
|
|
132,948 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
|
16,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,178 |
|
|
|
75,556 |
|
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis(c) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
243,242 |
|
|
|
252,119 |
|
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
|
|
18,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
25,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
|
|
65,188 |
|
|
Karl Bostaph(d) |
|
|
|
93,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
20,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,168 |
|
|
|
462,145 |
|
|
|
Min S. Chong |
|
|
|
19,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
951,804 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
1,001,516 |
|
|
(6) Ms. Faccin's compensation was from her hire date of June 10, 2024 through September 30, 2024.
life sciences and intermediates business unit general manager transition
In connection with the voluntary resignation of Mr. Ashok Kalyana on May 10, 2024, management of the Life Sciences and Intermediates Business Units transitioned to Ms. Faccin on June 10, 2024.
Ms. Faccin received a make whole sign on bonus in the form of cash and stock. Ashland also paid for Ms. Faccin’s relocation back to the United States from an expatriate assignment in Singapore as a part of our standard executive mobility policy. For additional details regarding her relocation package, please see the notes following the Summary Compensation Table.
personal care and specialty additives business unit general manager transition
In connection with a corporate reorganization, Mr. Min S. Chong was separated from the Company on April 30, 2024 and entered into a Separation and General Release Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with the Company. Under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Chong received (1) a lump sum severance payment equal to 1.5 times annual base salary, (2) 18 months of continued coverage under Ashland’s medical and dental plans at the same cost Mr. Chong was paying as an active employee, (3) a pro-rata short term incentive payment for fiscal 2024, based on target performance, (4) pro-rata vesting with respect to outstanding PSUs, based on actual performance and payable in accordance with the terms of such awards, (5) pro-rata accelerated vesting of outstanding RSUs; and (6) certain other benefits, including outplacement and financial planning expense reimbursements all in accordance with the Ashland Inc. Senior Leadership Severance Plan.
46 / ashland.com |
|
|
2024 executive compensation tables
fiscal 2024 grants of plan-based awards
The following table sets forth details regarding non-equity and equity plan-based awards granted to each of the NEOs in FY2024:
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
All |
|
Grant |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
|
Grant |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
or Units |
|
Awards |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guillermo Novo |
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
564,250 |
|
|
|
1,410,625 |
|
|
|
2,821,250 |
|
|
|
19,698 |
|
|
|
39,395 |
|
|
|
78,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,202,420 |
|
|
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,263 |
|
|
|
1,999,927 |
|
|
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,940 |
|
|
|
7,879 |
|
|
|
15,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,484 |
|
|
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,252 |
|
|
|
399,940 |
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
226,897 |
|
|
|
567,243 |
|
|
|
1,134,486 |
|
|
|
5,587 |
|
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
22,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
908,253 |
|
|
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,173 |
|
|
|
850,824 |
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
7/25/2024 |
|
|
127,400 |
|
|
|
318,500 |
|
|
|
637,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/25/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,234 |
|
|
|
1,439,918 |
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
152,829 |
|
|
|
382,073 |
|
|
|
764,145 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
12,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489,366 |
|
|
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
458,423 |
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
103,072 |
|
|
|
257,680 |
|
|
|
515,359 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
6,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,869 |
|
|
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
237,816 |
|
Min S. Chong(6) |
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
127,923 |
|
|
|
319,807 |
|
|
|
639,613 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
11,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,620 |
|
|
|
11/14/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
442,736 |
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 47 |
2024 executive compensation tables
fiscal 2024 outstanding equity awards
The following table sets forth certain information regarding Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”), PSUs, and RSUs held by each of the NEOs as of September 30, 2024.
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
Stock Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
|
Number of |
|
Option |
|
Option |
|
|
Number |
|
Market |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
70,047 |
|
|
|
|
76.76 |
|
|
|
1/2/2030 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,278 |
|
|
|
|
4,372,640 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
102,027 |
|
|
|
|
8,873,288 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
22,100 |
|
|
|
|
77.90 |
|
|
|
11/13/2029 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,200 |
|
|
|
|
82.34 |
|
|
|
11/15/2028 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,450 |
|
|
|
|
67.16 |
|
|
|
12/15/2027 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,583 |
|
|
|
|
57.96 |
|
|
|
12/16/2026 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,229 |
|
|
|
|
59.41 |
|
|
|
12/18/2025 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16,857 |
|
|
|
|
1,466,057 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
27,887 |
|
|
|
|
2,425,332 |
|
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,234 |
|
|
|
|
1,324,901 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
|
77.90 |
|
|
|
11/13/2029 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
|
82.34 |
|
|
|
11/15/2028 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
|
|
|
67.16 |
|
|
|
12/15/2027 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,793 |
|
|
|
|
57.96 |
|
|
|
12/16/2026 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18,902 |
|
|
|
|
1,643,948 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
15,026 |
|
|
|
|
1,306,811 |
|
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
|
362,307 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
|
511,645 |
|
|
||
Min Chong |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
7,650 |
|
|
|
|
665,321 |
|
|
performance stock units earned
The number of performance stock units (PSUs) earned for the fiscal 2022 – 2024 awards was determined by the Compensation Committee in November 2024 and was paid in shares in November 2024 below target in accordance with our pay for performance philosophy to pay below target for below target performance. These PSUs do not earn dividends or dividend equivalents. The PSUs earned are set forth in the table below.
Name |
|
2022 – 2024 LTIPP |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
11,096 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis(1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
418 |
|
|
Min S. Chong |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
(1) Ms. Faccin was hired in June 2024 and did not participate in the 2022-2024 awards.
48 / ashland.com |
|
|
2024 executive compensation tables
unvested RSUs
The following paragraphs list the unvested RSUs as of September 30, 2024 for each NEO. Unless otherwise noted, the RSUs vest in equal installments on each annual anniversary of the date of grant over a three-year period. Dividend equivalents are accrued on outstanding RSUs at the same time and at the same rate as dividends are paid to stockholders. Dividend equivalents on RSUs are only payable if the underlying RSU vests. At the time of vesting, one share of Ashland Common Stock is issued for each RSU and any accrued dividend equivalents are paid as additional shares of Ashland Common Stock.
For Mr. Novo, the amounts reported in these columns also represent:
For Mr. Willis, the amounts reported in these columns also represent:
For Ms. Faccin, the amounts reported in these columns also represent:
For Dr. Musa, the amounts reported in these columns also represent:
For Mr. Bostaph, the amounts reported in these columns also represent:
fiscal 2024 option exercises and stock vested
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the value realized by each NEO during fiscal 2024 upon the exercise of SARs and the vesting of PSUs and RSUs.
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized on |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value Realized on |
||||||||||||
Name |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
($) |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
|
2,510,502 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
24,672 |
|
|
|
|
708,333 |
|
|
|
|
10,247 |
|
|
|
|
790,925 |
|
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Osama. M. Musa |
|
|
12,523 |
|
|
|
|
456,360 |
|
|
|
|
5,607 |
|
|
|
|
432,756 |
|
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
|
101,319 |
|
|
Min S. Chong(5) |
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
|
104,648 |
|
|
|
|
14,811 |
|
|
|
|
1,284,518 |
|
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 49 |
2024 executive compensation tables
non-qualified deferred compensation plans
The following table sets forth certain information for each of the named executive officers regarding non-qualified deferred compensation for fiscal 2024:
Name |
|
Executive |
|
Registrant |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
|
123,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
69,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
55,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
1,696,974 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
24,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
353,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
3,230,694 |
|
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
|
|
113,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
140,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
1,006,011 |
|
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
3,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
104,769 |
|
|
Min S. Chong |
|
|
|
40,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
57,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
387,914 |
|
|
50 / ashland.com |
|
|
2024 executive compensation tables
Ashland deferred compensation plan for employees (employee deferral plan)
The Employee Deferral Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of highly compensated employees. Participants may elect to have up to 50% of base pay and up to 75% of their annual cash incentive compensation contributed to the plan. Elections to defer compensation generally must be made in the calendar year prior to the calendar year in which the compensation is earned.
Participants elect how to invest their account balances from among a diverse set of mutual fund offerings and a hypothetical Ashland Common Stock Fund. No guaranteed interest or earnings are available and there are no above market rates of return on investments in the plan. Investments in the Ashland Common Stock Fund may not be changed and must be distributed as Ashland Common Stock. In all other events, participants may freely elect to change their investments. Withdrawals are generally allowed for an unforeseeable emergency (single sum payment sufficient to meet the emergency), disability (lump sum payment), upon separation from employment (payable as lump sum or installments per election) and at a specified time (paid as single sum). In addition, for pre-2005 contributions, participants may elect to have withdrawals paid in a lump sum (subject to a penalty of up to 10%).
In the event of a change in control, participants will receive an automatic lump sum distribution with respect to deferrals made before January 1, 2005 and will receive distributions with respect to deferrals made following January 1, 2005 in accordance with each employee’s election.
non-qualified defined contribution plan for certain employees (nqdcp)
On September 22, 2016, the Compensation Committee froze the Non-Qualified Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan for Certain Employees to future benefits as of September 30, 2016. In connection with such freeze, the Compensation Committee adopted the NQDCP to continue to provide benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated Ashland employees that supplements the limitation on compensation imposed by Section 401(a)(17) of the Code (including successor provisions thereto) on qualified Ashland Employee Savings Plan contributions.
The NQDCP is an unfunded, non-qualified plan that provides a base contribution of 4% and a matching contribution of 4%, in each case, on annual incentive compensation paid and eligible earnings in excess of limits established under Code Section 401(a)(17) not permitted in the qualified 401(k) plan. The account balance may be invested in the mutual funds available in the Employees’ Deferral Plan. The benefit payable under the NQDCP will be made in installments or as a lump sum based on distribution elections. Withdrawals outside of distribution elections are allowed for an unforeseeable emergency (single sum payment sufficient to meet the emergency) or disability (lump sum payment). Under the NQDCP, a participant will become 100% vested in his or her accounts upon a change in control. Named executive officers and certain other highly compensated participants cannot begin to receive distributions for six months following separation from service.
potential payments upon termination or change in control
senior leadership severance plan
In fiscal year 2022, the Committee approved a new plan, the Senior Leadership Severance Plan. The Senior Leadership Severance Plan provides benefits in the event of a termination of employment or change in control (“CIC”). These benefits are similar to the benefits previously provided under the Severance Pay Plan and Salary Continuation Plan.
In the case of a CIC, severance benefits are payable only if both parts of the “double trigger” are satisfied. That is, (i) there must be a CIC of the Company, and (ii) the NEO must (a) be involuntarily terminated without cause, or (b) the NEO must initiate the termination for good reason.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 51 |
2024 executive compensation tables
Benefits provided under the Senior Leadership Severance Plan are conditioned on the executive executing a release of claims. The general release may provide that the executive agrees to certain non-compete, non-solicitation, confidentiality and similar covenants set forth in the release agreement.
Situation |
|
Position |
|
Severance (1) |
Prior FY |
Current FY |
|
COBRA Coverage(2) |
Non-CIC Termination of Employment Without Cause |
|
CEO |
|
2x Annual Base Salary |
Unpaid |
Pro-rata |
|
Duration for the shorter of (i) the number of months corresponding to the years (and fractions thereof) of the severance multiple, (ii) the applicable COBRA continuation period; or (iii) the date on which the executive becomes eligible for third-party coverage
|
|
Other |
|
1.5x Annual Base Salary |
|||||
CIC Termination of Employment without Cause or Good Reason |
|
CEO |
|
3x Annual Base Salary + Target AIP |
|
|||
|
Other |
|
2x Annual Base Salary + Target AIP |
In addition to these severance payments, under either of the situations described in the table above, the NEOs are eligible to receive outplacement services for up to one year and continued financial planning for the year of termination (or termination date, if hired after September 2022). In the event an executive is terminated without cause or initiates termination for good reason following a CIC, the Company shall also (i) reimburse the executive for any legal fees or expenses incurred during his or her lifetime to enforce payment of benefits under the Senior Leadership Severance Plan and (ii) pay or provide, to the extent not already paid or provided, any other amounts or benefits to which the executive is entitled under any Company plan, program, policy, practice, contract, or agreement.
potential payments upon termination or change in control table
The following table summarizes the estimated amounts payable to each named executive officer in the event of a termination from employment or change in control as of September 30, 2024. A narrative description follows the table. Different termination events are identified in columns (b)-(g). Column (a) enumerates the types of potential payments for each named executive officer. As applicable, each payment or benefit is estimated across the table under the appropriate column or columns.
These estimates are based on the assumption that the various triggering events occur on September 30, 2024, the last day of fiscal 2024. Other material assumptions used in calculating the estimated compensation and benefits under each triggering event are noted below. The actual amounts that would be paid to a named executive officer upon certain terminations of employment or upon a change in control can only be determined at the time an actual triggering event occurs.
52 / ashland.com |
|
|
2024 executive compensation tables
|
|
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control |
|
|||||||||||||||
Name/Kinds of Payments |
|
Termination |
|
Death and |
|
Voluntary |
|
Retirement(3) |
|
Change in |
|
Termination |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guillermo Novo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(6) |
|
2,257,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
7,617,375 |
|
Restricted Stock(7) |
|
2,015,356 |
|
|
2,015,356 |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,015,356 |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,392,691 |
|
Performance Stock(8) |
|
4,997,035 |
|
|
4,997,035 |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,997,035 |
|
|
— |
|
|
8,873,288 |
|
Incentive Compensation(9) |
|
1,410,625 |
|
|
1,410,625 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,410,625 |
|
|
1,410,625 |
|
|
1,410,625 |
|
Welfare Benefit |
|
25,228 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
25,228 |
|
Outplacement |
|
5,200 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,200 |
|
Financial Planning |
|
26,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
26,000 |
|
Severance Cutback(10) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
10,736,444 |
|
|
8,423,016 |
|
|
— |
|
|
8,423,016 |
|
|
1,410,625 |
|
|
22,350,407 |
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(6) |
|
945,405 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,395,026 |
|
Restricted Stock(7) |
|
1,464,401 |
|
|
1,464,401 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,464,580 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,472,780 |
|
Performance Stock(8) |
|
2,390,197 |
|
|
2,390,197 |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,390,197 |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,425,332 |
|
Incentive Compensation(9) |
|
567,243 |
|
|
567,243 |
|
|
— |
|
|
567,243 |
|
|
567,243 |
|
|
567,243 |
|
Welfare Benefit |
|
35,990 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
35,990 |
|
Outplacement |
|
5,200 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,200 |
|
Financial Planning |
|
15,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
15,000 |
|
Severance Cutback(10) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
5,423,436 |
|
|
4,421,840 |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,422,019 |
|
|
567,243 |
|
|
6,916,571 |
|
O. Musa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(6) |
|
764,145 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,783,005 |
|
Restricted Stock(7) |
|
1,646,690 |
|
|
1,646,690 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,646,690 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,651,487 |
|
Performance Stock(8) |
|
1,287,852 |
|
|
1,287,852 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,287,852 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,306,811 |
|
Incentive Compensation(9) |
|
400,260 |
|
|
400,260 |
|
|
— |
|
|
400,260 |
|
|
400,260 |
|
|
400,260 |
|
Welfare Benefit |
|
35,798 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
35,798 |
|
Outplacement |
|
5,200 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,200 |
|
Financial Planning |
|
15,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
15,000 |
|
Severance Cutback(10) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
4,154,945 |
|
|
3,334,802 |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,334,802 |
|
|
400,260 |
|
|
5,197,561 |
|
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(6) |
|
735,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,617,000 |
|
Restricted Stock(7) |
|
148,371 |
|
|
148,371 |
|
|
— |
|
|
148,371 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,330,976 |
|
Performance Stock(8) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Incentive Compensation(9) |
|
96,487 |
|
|
96,487 |
|
|
— |
|
|
96,487 |
|
|
96,487 |
|
|
96,487 |
|
Welfare Benefit |
|
35,798 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
35,798 |
|
Outplacement |
|
5,200 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,200 |
|
Financial Planning |
|
15,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
15,000 |
|
Severance Cutback(10) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
1,035,856 |
|
|
244,858 |
|
|
— |
|
|
244,858 |
|
|
96,487 |
|
|
3,100,462 |
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(6) |
|
594,645 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,308,219 |
|
Restricted Stock(7) |
|
362,752 |
|
|
362,752 |
|
|
— |
|
|
362,752 |
|
|
— |
|
|
363,968 |
|
Performance Stock(8) |
|
507,383 |
|
|
507,383 |
|
|
— |
|
|
507,383 |
|
|
— |
|
|
507,383 |
|
Incentive Compensation(9) |
|
269,946 |
|
|
269,946 |
|
|
— |
|
|
269,946 |
|
|
269,946 |
|
|
269,946 |
|
Welfare Benefit |
|
18,694 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
18,694 |
|
Outplacement |
|
5,200 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
5,200 |
|
Financial Planning |
|
15,000 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
15,000 |
|
Severance Cutback(10) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
1,773,620 |
|
|
1,140,081 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,140,081 |
|
|
269,946 |
|
|
2,488,411 |
|
Min S. Chong(11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Severance(6) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Restricted Stock(7) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Performance Stock(8) |
|
665,321 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
665,321 |
|
Incentive Compensation(9) |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Welfare Benefit |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Outplacement |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Financial Planning |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Severance Cutback(10) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
665,321 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
665,321 |
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 53 |
2024 executive compensation tables
The amounts reported in the columns titled “Change in Control without Termination,” and “Termination after Change in Control of the Company without cause or by the Executive for Good Reason” pertain to the LTIPP PSUs. Pursuant to the 2018 Omnibus Plan and the 2021 Omnibus Plan and the PSU award agreements thereunder, in the event of a change in control prior to the vesting date for the fiscal 2023-2025 and 2024-2026 LTIPP PSUs, if provision for the assumption or substitution of the PSUs is made, then the PSUs will convert into a number of time-based, stock settled RSUs, with such number determined based upon actual achievement of the performance goals through the date of the change in control (without pro-ration), and such RSUs shall continue to vest; provided that, in the event that the participant’s service is terminated without cause or for “good reason,” and not as a result of the NEO’s disability or death, during the two-year period beginning on the date of the change in control, then such RSUs shall immediately vest in full upon the date of such termination.
54 / ashland.com |
|
|
2024 executive compensation tables
executive change in control agreements
Messrs. Novo and Willis executed change in control agreements in January 2020 and October 2015 respectively with Ashland. These agreements describe the payments and benefits to which the executive is entitled in the event of a qualifying termination of employment within the two-year period following a change in control of Ashland.
If within two years after a change in control (see the “Definitions” section below) an executive’s employment is terminated without cause or the executive terminates employment for good reason (see the “Definitions” section below), the executive is entitled to the following:
Benefit |
|
CEO |
|
Other NEOs |
Base Compensation |
|
Three times the sum of his or her highest annual base compensation and highest target percentage annual incentive compensation in respect of the prior three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the termination occurs in a lump sum paid in the seventh month following termination. |
|
Two times the sum of his or her highest annual base compensation and highest target percentage annual incentive compensation in respect of the prior three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the termination occurs in a lump sum paid in the seventh month following termination. |
|
|
|
||
Medical, dental and group life |
|
Ashland continues to subsidize its share of the premium for the same severance period and an additional cash payment equal to the subsidized premiums for the number of months, if any, by which the severance multiple exceeds the COBRA continuation period. |
|
Ashland continues to subsidize its share of the premium for the same severance period and an additional cash payment equal to the subsidized premiums for the number of months, if any, by which the severance multiple exceeds the COBRA continuation period. |
|
|
|
||
Performance Units |
|
Full payment at target in cash of any then-outstanding Performance Unit awards granted under the LTIPP (less any amounts already paid under the LTIPP because of the change in control). |
|
Full payment at target in cash of any then-outstanding Performance Unit awards granted under the LTIPP (less any amounts already paid under the LTIPP because of the change in control). |
|
|
|
||
Restricted Units |
|
Immediate vesting of all outstanding RSE/RSUs. |
|
Immediate vesting of all outstanding RSE/RSUs. |
|
|
|
||
Incentive Compensation |
|
Payment in cash equal to the amount earned for any prior fiscal year for which the CEO has not yet received payment, and payment of the pro-rata portion (through the date of termination) of any incentive compensation for the fiscal year in which the date of termination occurs calculated on the basis of the target bonus percentage of base compensation in the applicable incentive compensation plan. |
|
Payment in cash of any earned incentive compensation for completed performance periods not already paid and pro-rata(1) payment of any incentive compensation at target level for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. |
|
|
|
||
Outplacement and Financial Planning |
|
Outplacement services for one year after termination and financial planning for the calendar year in which the termination occurs. |
|
Outplacement services for one year after termination and financial planning for the calendar year in which the termination occurs. |
|
|
|
||
Vacation |
|
Payment of all unused, earned and accrued vacation in a lump sum. |
|
Payment of all unused, earned and accrued vacation in a lump sum. |
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 55 |
2024 executive compensation tables
(1) Payment to J. Kevin Willis would be equal to the highest annual incentive target of the past three fiscal years pursuant to his separate employment agreement.
As a condition to receiving the benefits and compensation payable under the agreement, each NEO has agreed for a period of 24 months (36 months for the CEO) following termination following a change in control other than by reason of death or disability, for cause or voluntary termination without good reason, absent prior written consent of Ashland’s General Counsel, to refrain from engaging in competitive activity against Ashland; and to refrain from soliciting persons working for Ashland, soliciting customers of Ashland or otherwise interfering with Ashland’s business relationships. Pursuant to the agreement, each executive has also agreed not to disclose Ashland’s confidential information, subject to limited exceptions. If an executive breaches the agreement, Ashland has the right to recover benefits that have been paid to the executive. Finally, an executive may recover legal fees and expenses incurred as a result of Ashland’s unsuccessful legal challenge to the agreement or the executive’s interpretation of the agreement.
definitions
“Cause” is any of the following:
To be terminated for cause, the Board of Directors must pass a resolution by three quarters vote finding that the termination is for cause.
“Good reason” includes any of the following that occurs after a change in control:
“Change in control” is a complex definition, but may be summarized to include any of the following:
56 / ashland.com |
|
|
2024 executive compensation tables
incentive compensation, RSE/RSUs and PSUs
On July 15, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved an amendment to the 2015 Incentive Plan, which provides for the Committee to have the option to grant awards under the 2015 Incentive Plan with double-trigger change in control provisions set forth in an award agreement. The default under the 2015 Incentive Plan is a single-trigger change in control provision. In connection with this amendment, the Committee also approved forms of the award agreements generally containing the double-trigger change in control vesting provision in the event of a termination without cause within one year following a change in control, which we refer to as the “2015 Amended Award Agreements”. All awards granted to named executive officers under the 2015 Incentive Plan since this amendment have used the 2015 Amended Award Agreements. Other than this change, the 2015 Amended Award Agreements are substantially similar to the prior award agreements.
Under the 2021 Omnibus Plan, in the event provision is made in connection with the change in control for the assumption or substitution of awards previously granted, the award agreements for the 2021 Omnibus Plan provide for double-trigger vesting provisions for each award type upon termination without cause or a resignation for good reason within one year following a change in control.
If the awards are not assumed or substituted in connection with the change in control, awards previously granted will be treated as follows:
For purposes of the above descriptions, the term “change in control” is defined in the applicable plan or, in the case of the 2021 Omnibus Plan, in either the plan or the award agreements, and has substantially the same meaning as it does in the executive change in control agreements. In addition, the award agreements and incentive plans provide for forfeiture and clawbacks in the event the participant breaches certain non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality (subject to whistleblower protections) covenants.
For purposes of the above descriptions, the term without “cause” has substantially the same meaning as it does in the executive change in control agreements, and the term “good reason” means the occurrence of either a reduction to base salary of at least 15% or a relocation exceeding 50 miles.
SERP, excess plans, qualified pension plan, employees’ deferral plan and non-qualified defined contribution plan
For payments and benefits under the Employees’ Deferral Plan and the Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plan, except in the event of a change in control, see the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” table and the narrative thereunder in this Proxy Statement.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 57 |
2024 executive compensation tables
after a change in control
The term “change in control” is defined in the Employees’ Deferral Plan and the Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plan and has substantially the same meaning as it does in the executive change in control agreements. Under the Employees’ Deferral Plan, a change in control results in an automatic lump sum distribution of the benefit for deferrals made before January 1, 2005. Deferrals made on and after January 1, 2005, will not be automatically distributed upon a change in control, but rather will be distributed pursuant to each employee’s election and valued at the time of the distribution. Under the NQDCP, a participant will become one hundred percent (100%) vested in his or her accounts upon a change in control.
58 / ashland.com |
|
|
CEO pay ratio
Pursuant to Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of SEC Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Guillermo Novo, our Chair and Chief Executive Officer.
For fiscal 2024,
Based on this information for fiscal 2024, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Novo to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 117:1.
To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee” for this purpose, the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments and estimates that were used were as follows:
The CEO pay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on the methodologies and assumptions described above, which were chosen from a wide range of permissible methodologies, estimates and assumptions. As a result, the CEO pay ratios reported by other companies, which may have employed other permitted methodologies or assumptions, and which may have a significantly different work force structure from ours, are likely not comparable to our CEO pay ratio.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 59 |
pay versus performance
The following table sets forth the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and the financial performance of the Company in accordance with SEC rules. It includes compensation for our Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”), Mr. Guillermo Novo, and the average compensation for all other NEOs, or the non-PEO NEOs. The Compensation Committee does not necessarily consider these measures or calculations in setting compensation for the named executive officers or for linking executive compensation with Company performance for 2024 or any prior periods disclosed. For a description of the Compensation Committee’s processes, policies, and considerations when setting compensation and evaluating performance, please see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 28 of this Proxy Statement.
pay versus performance table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Summary |
|
Compensation |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Total |
|
Peer Group |
|
Net Income |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(1)(2) |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(1)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
($)(3) |
|
(millions) |
|
(millions)(4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
(d) |
|
(e) |
|
(f) |
|
(g) |
|
(h) |
|
(i) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||||
2023 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||||
2022 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||||||
2021 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
PEO(s) |
|
Non-PEO NEOs |
2024 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis, Alessandra Faccin Assis, Osama M. Musa, Karl Bostaph, Min S. Chong |
|
2023 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis, Osama M. Musa, Min S. Chong, Ashok Kalyana, Xiao L. Wang |
|
2022 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis, Osama M. Musa, Min S. Chong, Ashok Kalyana |
|
2021 |
|
|
J. Kevin Willis, Osama M. Musa, Min S. Chong, Eric N. Boni, Peter J. Ganz, Keith C. Silverman |
60 / ashland.com |
|
|
pay versus performance
|
|
FY 2021 |
|
|
FY 2022 |
|
|
FY 2023 |
|
|
FY 2024 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments |
|
PEO |
|
Avg. non-PEO NEO |
|
|
PEO |
|
|
Avg. non-PEO NEO |
|
|
PEO |
|
|
Avg. non-PEO NEO |
|
|
PEO |
|
|
Avg. non-PEO NEO |
|
||||||||
Summary Compensation table total for applicable year. |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Decrease for Amounts Reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table for Applicable FY |
|
$ |
( |
) |
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
Increase based on ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Remain Unvested as of Applicable FY End, determined as of Applicable FY End. RSU values include RSUs attributable to reinvested Dividend Equivalents |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Increase based on ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Vested during Applicable FY, determined as of Vesting Date |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Increase (decrease) for Awards Granted during Prior FY that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Applicable FY End, determined based on change in ASC 718 Fair Value from Prior FY End to Applicable FY End |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|||||
Increase (decrease) for Awards Granted during Prior FY that Vested During Applicable FY, determined based on change in ASC 718 Fair Value from Prior FY End to Vesting Date |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Decrease of ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Prior FY that were Forfeited during Applicable FY, determined as of Prior FY End |
|
$ |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|||||
Increase based on Dividends or Other Earnings Paid during Applicable FY prior to Vesting Date |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Increase (decrease) for Change in the Actuarial Present Values reported under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” Column of the Summary Compensation Table for Applicable FY |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Increase for Service Cost and, if applicable, Prior Service Cost for Pension Plans |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Compensation Actually Paid |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 61 |
pay versus performance
pay versus performance relationship
The chart below provides a comparison between (i) the total stockholder return of Ashland and our Peer Group – Materials assuming a fixed $100 initial investment on October 1, 2020 and reinvestment of dividends, and (ii) the compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, September 30, 2022, September 30, 2023 and September 30, 2024.
|
|
FY 2020 |
|
FY 2021 |
|
FY 2022 |
|
FY 2023 |
|
FY 2024 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Ashland TSR |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|||||
Peer Group - Materials TSR |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|||||
PEO Compensation Actually Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|||||
Avg non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
62 / ashland.com |
|
|
pay versus performance
The chart below provides a comparison between (i) Ashland’s Adjusted EBITDA and (ii) compensation actually paid to our PEO and average compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, September 30, 2022, September 30, 2023 and September 30, 2024.
|
|
FY 2021 |
|
FY 2022 |
|
FY 2023 |
|
FY 2024 |
||||||||||||||||
Adj. EBITDA (in millions) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||
PEO Compensation Actually Paid |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||
Avg non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 63 |
pay versus performance
The chart below provides a comparison between (i) Ashland’s Net Income and (ii) compensation actually paid to our PEO and average compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, September 30, 2022, September 30, 2023 and September 30, 2024.
|
|
FY 2021 |
|
FY 2022 |
|
FY 2023 |
|
FY 2024 |
||||||||||||||||
Net Income (in millions) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||
PEO Compensation Actually Paid |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
||||
Avg non-PEO NEO Compensation Actually Paid |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
performance measures
The following performance measures are the most important used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the NEOs to company performance during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024. The measures listed are not ranked
Company-selected performance measures: |
64 / ashland.com |
|
|
proposal two — ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm
The Audit Committee of the Board has recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, the appointment of Ernst and Young, LLP (“EY”) to audit Ashland’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting for fiscal 2025, subject to ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of EY to serve as Ashland’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Ashland and its stockholders. In making such a determination, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, an evaluation of EY’s performance, qualifications, independence, tenure, and appropriateness of fees, as well as the potential impact of changing auditors.
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by EY for fiscal years 2024 and 2023.
|
|
2024 |
|
2023 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Audit Fees(1) |
|
$ |
5,702,046 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,520,000 |
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2) |
|
|
655,911 |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Tax Fees(3) |
|
|
237,988 |
|
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
|
Total Other Fees(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,595,945 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,662,000 |
|
|
Representatives of EY will attend the Annual Meeting to respond to questions from stockholders and will be given the opportunity to make a statement.
The stockholders are being asked to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of EY. Ratification of the appointment of EY requires approval by a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon who are present in person or by proxy. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast either for or against the proposal. As this proposal is considered a “routine” matter by the New York Stock Exchange, there should not be any broker non-votes cast in connection with this proposal. If the stockholders fail to ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee may, but is not required to, reconsider whether to retain EY. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of Ashland and its stockholders.
If no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, Guillermo Novo or Robin E. Lampkin (proxies named on the proxy card) will vote on your behalf FOR the ratification of EY as Ashland’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the ratification of EY as Ashland’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025. |
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 65 |
audit committee report
The Audit Committee currently is composed of five independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. At its November 2024 meeting, the Board determined that all current Audit Committee members—Ms. Main and Messrs. Joseph, Peribere, Pedreiro and Tozier—are independent as defined by SEC rules, the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, which apply to Ashland, and Ashland’s Standards. The Board also determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC rules.
The Audit Committee assists in fulfilling the oversight responsibilities of the Board relating to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and financial reporting process, the integrity of the Company’s systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors, the independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and audit of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s risk management policies and processes, including cybersecurity risks, the Company’s financial affairs, including capital allocation framework, prioritization, significant decisions and risk considerations, and legal and regulatory compliance requirements. The Audit Committee through its Chair is also directly involved in the selection of the independent auditor’s lead engagement partner, which occurs every five years. The Company's lead engagement partner rotation occurred in November 2024 for the fiscal 2025 audit.
During fiscal 2024, the Audit Committee met eight times, including teleconferences to discuss and review Ashland’s quarterly financial performance, associated news releases, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual report on Form 10-K.
The Company’s management has primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal financial controls, for preparing the financial statements and for the public reporting process. The independent auditors are responsible for expressing opinions on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), an independent registered public accounting firm, was engaged to audit Ashland’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2024 and to issue an opinion on whether such statements present fairly, in all material respects, Ashland’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. EY was also engaged to audit and to issue an opinion on the effectiveness of Ashland’s internal control over financial reporting. Prior to any engagement of EY by Ashland, the engagement was approved in accordance with established policies and procedures. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and EY the audited financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Ashland’s internal control over financial reporting, and EY’s evaluation of Ashland’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee further reviewed EY’s judgment as to the quality and acceptability of Ashland’s accounting principles, financial reporting process and controls and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”) and the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee received and reviewed EY’s independence from management and Ashland including the matters in the written disclosures required by the PCAOB.
The Audit Committee has adopted strict guidelines on the use of the independent registered public accounting firm to provide non-audit services. The Audit Committee must pre-approve any non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. In circumstances where the engagement of independent auditors to perform work beyond the scope of and not contemplated in the original pre-approval occurs, specific pre-approval of the additional services is required by the Audit Committee Chair prior to the engagement of the independent auditors for those services and must be subsequently approved by the Audit Committee at its next meeting. In fiscal 2024, approval was sought and granted to EY to perform certain non-audit related services. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of audit-related and other non-audit services by EY is compatible with maintaining
66 / ashland.com |
|
|
audit committee report
EY’s independence and has concluded that EY’s independence is not compromised by providing such services.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that Ashland’s consolidated financial statements be accepted for inclusion in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, for filing with the SEC.
audit committee
Sergio Pedreiro, Chair
Wetteny Joseph
Susan L. Main
Jerome A. Peribere
Scott A. Tozier
The Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that Ashland specifically incorporates the Audit Committee Report by reference therein.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 67 |
proposal three — non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers
Under Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the stockholders of Ashland are entitled to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, at the Annual Meeting, on a resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.
In January 2023, Ashland’s Board approved a resolution providing that the executive compensation vote described in this Proposal Three shall be submitted to the stockholders annually.
Accordingly, the stockholders are being asked to vote upon, and the Board has approved and unanimously recommends, the following non-binding advisory resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.
The stockholder vote on executive compensation is an advisory vote only, and it is not binding on Ashland, Ashland’s Board or the Compensation Committee.
As described more fully in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section on page 28 of this Proxy Statement, Ashland’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain individuals with the skills required to formulate and drive Ashland’s strategic direction and achieve short-term and long-term performance goals necessary to create stockholder value.
Ashland has several governance programs in place to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and mitigate risks in its plans. These programs include: stock ownership guidelines, limited perquisites, an anti-hedging policy, an anti-pledging policy and a clawback policy.
The non-binding advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the named executive officers described in this Proposal Three shall be approved if a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon who are present in person or by proxy vote in favor of the resolution. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as either votes cast for or against the resolution.
If no voting specification is made on a properly returned or voted proxy card, Guillermo Novo or Robin E. Lampkin (proxies named on the proxy card) will vote on your behalf FOR the approval of the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement and described in this Proposal Three.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR a non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion. |
68 / ashland.com |
|
|
beneficial ownership of common stock — certain other beneficial owners
The following table reports the number of shares of Ashland common stock that were beneficially owned by each person that has publicly reported ownership of more than five percent (5%) of Ashland’s outstanding shares of common stock as of the close of business on November 25, 2024.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Aggregate Number |
|
Percentage |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Vanguard Group |
|
|
4,862,394 |
(2) |
|
|
9.6% |
|
100 Vanguard Blvd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malvern, PA 19355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
|
4,484,530 |
(3) |
|
|
8.8% |
|
55 East 52nd Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP |
|
|
2,774,677 |
(4) |
|
|
5.5% |
|
Building One |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6300 Bee Cave Road |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, Texas 78746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eminence Capital, LP |
|
|
2,647,555 |
(5) |
|
|
5.2% |
|
399 Park Avenue, 25th Floor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, New York 10022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Financial Services Company |
|
|
2,598,602 |
(6) |
|
|
5.1% |
|
111 Huntington Avenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 69 |
beneficial ownership of common stock — management
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of Ashland common stock as of the close of business on November 25, 2024, by:
common stock ownership
Name of Beneficial Owner |
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
Percent of Shares Beneficially Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guillermo Novo |
|
126,738 |
|
* |
|
J. Kevin Willis |
|
232,716 |
|
* |
(1)(2) |
Alessandra Faccin Assis |
|
— |
|
* |
|
Osama M. Musa |
|
26,609 |
|
* |
|
Karl Bostaph |
|
7,012 |
|
* |
|
Min S. Chong |
|
12,723 |
|
* |
(2) |
Steven D. Bishop |
|
6,357 |
|
* |
(2)(3) |
Sanat Chattopadhyay |
|
2,607 |
|
* |
(2)(3) |
Suzan F. Harrison |
|
3,877 |
|
* |
(3) |
Ashish K. Kulkarni(a) |
|
1,019 |
|
* |
(3) |
Wetteny Joseph(b) |
|
5,909 |
|
* |
(3) |
Susan L. Main |
|
13,399 |
|
* |
(3) |
Sergio Pedreiro |
|
2,799 |
|
* |
(3) |
Jerome A. Peribere |
|
12,485 |
|
* |
(3) |
Janice J. Teal(b) |
|
39,629 |
|
* |
(2)(3) |
Scott Tozier(a) |
|
1,153 |
|
* |
(3) |
All directors and current executive officers as a group (20 people) |
|
482,309 |
|
* |
(1)(2)(3) |
* Less than one percent based upon a total of 47,180,428 shares of common stock outstanding on November 25, 2024.
70 / ashland.com |
|
|
delinquent section 16(a) reports
Under the securities laws, directors, certain officers and persons holding more than 10% of our common stock must report their initial ownership of our common stock and any changes in their ownership to the SEC. The SEC has designated specific due dates for these reports, and we must identify in this Proxy Statement those persons who did not file these reports when due. Based solely on our review of copies of the reports filed with the SEC and the written representations of our directors and executive officers, we believe that each person who at any time during the 2024 fiscal year was a director or an executive officer or held more than 10% of our common stock filed the required reports on time in fiscal year 2024 except for one Form 4 filing for Mr. Bostaph, that was inadvertently filed late on November 27, 2023 due to administrative error.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 71 |
questions and answers about the 2025 annual meeting
q: |
|
why did I receive the proxy materials? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Ashland Inc. (the “Company”) has made these proxy materials available to you on the Internet, or upon your request, has delivered printed copies of these proxy materials to you, in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held virtually on Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. (EST). You are invited to participate in and vote on the items of business described in this proxy statement at the Annual Meeting. |
q: |
|
what is included in the proxy materials? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
These proxy materials include: • our 2025 proxy statement for the Annual Meeting • our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on November 18, 2024; and • the proxy card or a voting instructions form for the Annual Meeting. |
q: |
|
Why did I receive a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the internet? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to provide all stockholders of the Company as of November 25, 2024 (the “Record Date”) with notice of and access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we have sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) because the Board of Directors of Ashland Inc, is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting including at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Instructions on how to vote, access the proxy materials over the internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. |
q: |
|
why did I receive the proxy materials in the mail? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
We are providing paper copies of the proxy materials to those stockholders who have previously requested to receive paper copies. If you do not want to receive paper copies of proxy materials on an ongoing basis, please sign up for electronic delivery by following the instructions on your proxy card or voter instruction form. |
q: |
|
what is a Proxy? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
A proxy is your legal appointment of another person to vote the stock you own; that other person is called a proxy. If you appoint someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is called a “proxy” or a “proxy card.” We have designated Guillermo Novo, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, and Robin E. Lampkin, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, to act as proxies for the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares if you provide a proxy in the manner described herein. |
72 / ashland.com |
|
|
questions and answers about the annual meeting
q: |
|
what is a Proxy Statement? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
A Proxy Statement is a document that sets forth the information required by the federal securities laws and regulations administered by the SEC which is intended to assist you with voting on an informed bases at the Annual Meeting. |
q: |
|
how do I attend the Annual Meeting? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
The 2025 Annual Meeting will be held virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ASH2025. If you are a stockholder of record (i.e., your shares of common stock are registered in your name with Equiniti Trust Company) and want to participate in the Annual Meeting, including by voting and submitting questions, you must register with our proxy solicitor, Alliance Advisors, in advance at web.viewproxy.com/ASH/2025. If you do not register, you may still attend the Annual Meeting via the live audio webcast if you are a confirmed stockholder, but you will not have the option to ask questions or vote your shares during the meeting. |
|
|
who can vote at the annual meeting? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Only stockholders of record of Ashland’s common stock at the close of business on Monday, November 25, 2024 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the 2025 Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of the Record Date, there were 47,180,428 shares issued and outstanding. Each share of common stock that you own entitles you to one vote. Your Notice or proxy card shows the number of shares of common stock that you own. |
q: |
|
what matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting? |
||
|
|
|
||
a: |
|
(1) |
|
The election of nine directors to hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until each of their successors have been elected and qualified; |
|
|
|
||
|
|
(2) |
|
Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as Ashland’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2025; and |
|
|
|
||
|
|
(3) |
|
A non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers. |
q: |
|
what are the recommendations of the board of directors? |
||
|
|
|
||
a: |
|
Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares as follows: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
FOR the election of the nine directors nominated by your Board of Directors; |
|
|
|
||
|
|
(2) |
|
FOR the ratification of EY as Ashland’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2025; and |
|
|
|
||
|
|
(3) |
|
FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers. |
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 73 |
questions and answers about the annual meeting
q: |
|
can I ask questions at the annual meeting? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
All stockholders may submit questions pertinent to meeting matters through the virtual Annual Meeting website. Questions will be addressed during the Annual Meeting, subject to time constraints. |
q: |
|
how do I vote? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
We encourage all stockholders to submit proxies in advance of the Annual Meeting by telephone, by Internet or by mail. Sending your proxy by any of these methods will not affect your right to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting electronically or by executing a proxy designating a representative to vote for you electronically at the Annual Meeting.
If you are a registered stockholder as of the Record Date, you can vote by (i) following the instructions on the Notice or proxy card to vote by telephone or Internet, (ii) signing, dating and mailing your proxy card or (iii) attending and voting electronically at the Annual Meeting.
If you hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, that institution will instruct you as to how your shares may be voted by proxy, including whether telephone or Internet voting options are available. |
|
|
what shares are included on the proxy card? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
If you are a registered stockholder of Ashland as of the Record Date, the proxy card represents all shares of Ashland Common Stock that are registered in your name as well as any shares you hold in the dividend reinvestment plan (the “DRP”) administered by EQ Shareowner Services (“EQ”) for investors in Ashland Common Stock and in the Employee Savings Plan, the Union Plan or the ISP Plan.
If your shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee has enclosed a voting instruction form for you to use to direct it how to vote the shares held by such broker, bank or other nominee. Please return your completed voting instruction form to your broker, bank or other nominee. If your broker, bank or other nominee permits you to provide voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone, you may vote that way as well. |
q: |
|
what does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card on or about the same time? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
It generally means that you hold shares registered in more than one account. In order to vote all of your shares, please sign, date and return each proxy card or voting instruction form in the postage-paid envelope provided or, if you vote via the Internet or telephone, please be sure to vote using each proxy card or voting instruction form you receive. |
q: |
|
how do I vote my shares in the DRP? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
The proxy card represents all shares of Ashland Common Stock that are registered in your name as well as any shares you hold in the DRP administered by EQ for investors in Ashland Common Stock. Therefore, you may vote your DRP shares (together with your shares of Ashland Common Stock) by (i) attending and voting electronically at the Annual Meeting, (ii) following the instructions on the Notice or proxy card to vote by telephone or Internet or (iii) signing, dating and mailing your proxy card. |
74 / ashland.com |
|
|
questions and answers about the annual meeting
q: |
|
how will the trustee of the employee savings plan, the union plan and the ISP plan vote? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Each participant in the Employee Savings Plan, the Union Plan, or the ISP Plan may instruct the Trustee on how to vote the shares of Ashland Common Stock credited to the participant’s account in each plan. In the case of the Union Plan or the ISP plan, such instructions will additionally be applied to a proportionate number of shares of Ashland Common Stock held in all other plan participants’ accounts for which voting instructions are not timely received by the Trustee (the “non-directed shares”). In the case of the Employee Savings Plan, each participant may separately instruct the Trustee on how to vote a proportionate number of non-directed shares. Each participant who gives the Trustee any such instruction acts as a named fiduciary for the applicable plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). Your vote must be received by the plan tabulator, before 5:00 p.m. (EST) on Wednesday, January 15, 2025. You may not vote your shares in such plans at the Annual Meeting. |
q: |
|
can I change my vote once I vote by mail, by telephone or over the Internet? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Yes. You have the right to change or revoke your proxy (1) at any time before the Annual Meeting by (a) notifying Ashland’s Secretary in writing at 8145 Blazer Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808, (b) returning a later dated proxy card or (c) entering a later dated telephone or Internet vote; or (2) by voting electronically during the Annual Meeting after registering at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ASH2025. Any changes or revocations of voting instructions to the Trustee of the Employee Savings Plan, the Union Plan, or the ISP Plan must be received by the plan tabulator, before 5:00 p.m. (EST) on Wednesday, January 15, 2025. |
q: |
|
who tabulates the votes? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Votes will be tabulated by Alliance Advisors, LLC as Inspector of Election for the Annual Meeting. |
q: |
|
how many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present in person or represented by proxy in order to constitute a quorum for all matters to come before the meeting. For purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, “shares of capital stock of the Company” include all shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. |
q: |
|
what vote is required to approve the proposals? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
a: |
|
(1) |
|
Election of Directors — a majority of votes cast for each director nominee |
|
|
|
||
|
|
(2) |
|
Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm for 2025 — a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon who are present in person or by proxy |
|
|
|
||
|
|
(3) |
|
Non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers — a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote thereon who are present in person or by proxy |
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 75 |
questions and answers about the annual meeting
q: |
|
what is a broker non-vote? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
A broker non-vote occurs when brokers, banks or other nominees holding shares for a beneficial owner have discretionary authority to vote on “routine” matters brought before a stockholder meeting, but the beneficial owner of the shares fails to provide the broker, bank or other nominee with specific instructions on how to vote any “non-routine” matters brought to a vote at the stockholders meeting. The only proposal that would be considered “routine” is the proposal for the ratification of the appointment of EY as Ashland’s independent registered public accountants for fiscal 2025. A broker, bank or other nominee will not be entitled to vote your shares on any “non-routine” matters, absent instructions from you. “Non-routine” matters include the election of directors and the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers. Consequently, if you do not submit any voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee may exercise its discretion to vote your shares on the proposal to ratify the appointment of EY. If your shares are voted on this proposal as directed by your broker, bank or other nominee, your shares will constitute broker non-votes on each of the other proposals. Broker non-votes will count for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists but will not be counted as votes cast with respect to such proposals. |
q: |
|
how will my shares be voted if I submit a proxy card but do not specify how I want to vote? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
All shares represented by validly executed proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting, and such shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions provided. If no voting specification is made on your returned proxy card, Guillermo Novo or Robin E. Lampkin, as individuals named on the proxy card, will vote in line with the Board’s recommendations with respect to any such proposal, i.e., (i) FOR the election of the nine director nominees, (ii) FOR the ratification of EY, and (iii) FOR the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, your Board of Directors knows of no business other than that set forth above to be transacted at the Annual Meeting, but if other matters requiring a vote do arise, it is the intention of Mr. Novo and Ms. Lampkin, as the individuals to whom you are granting your proxy, to vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters. |
q: |
|
how will broker non-votes and abstentions be treated? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Ashland will treat broker non-votes as present to determine whether or not there is a quorum at the Annual Meeting, but they will not be treated as entitled to vote on any “non-routine” matters. This means that broker non-votes will have no effect on whether any of the proposals pass. Abstentions will also be treated as present for the purpose of determining quorum, but as unvoted shares for the purpose of determining the approval of the election of directors, the ratification of EY and the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to Ashland’s named executive officers. Accordingly, we urge you to promptly give instructions to your broker to vote FOR your Board’s nominees by using the voting instruction card provided to you by your custodian. |
76 / ashland.com |
|
|
questions and answers about the annual meeting
q: |
|
where can I find the voting results of the annual meeting? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
We intend to announce preliminary voting results based on our proxy solicitor’s advice at the Annual Meeting. We expect to report the final results based on the report of Alliance Advisors, LLC on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the end of the Annual Meeting. You can obtain a copy of the Form 8-K from our website at http://investor.ashland.com, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for the location of the nearest public reference room or through the SEC’s EDGAR system at http://www.sec.gov. |
q: |
|
who can I contact if I have questions or need assistance in voting my shares, or if I need additional copies of the proxy materials? |
|
|
|
a: |
|
Please contact Alliance Advisors, LLC, the firm assisting us in the solicitation of proxies, toll-free at 1 (855) 973-0095. |
|
Important Notice regarding the availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on Tuesday, January 21, 2025.
This Proxy Statement and Ashland’s 2024 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at web.viewproxy.com/ASH/2025
|
date for receipt of stockholder proposals
stockholder proposals
The deadline for shareholders to submit proposals pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for our 2026 Annual Meeting is August 11, 2025. Any stockholder proposal received after August 11, 2025 will not be considered for inclusion in our 2026 Proxy Statement.
Our By-laws, as amended and restated, contain an advance notice procedure for matters a stockholder would like to present directly at an annual meeting (rather than submitting it for inclusion in Ashland’s proxy statement under Rule 14a-8. Stockholder proposals submitted outside of Rule 14a-8 for the 2026 Annual Meeting must be received no earlier than September 23, 2025 and no later than October 23, 2025. Section 2.08 of our By-laws specifies the information and statements that must be included in any stockholder proposal to be duly considered and presented at the 2026 Annual Meeting. SEC rules permit management to vote proxies in its discretion if: (1) Ashland receives written notice of the proposal before the deadlines specified in our By-laws, and Ashland advises stockholders in the 2026 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on such matter; or (2) Ashland does not receive notice of the proposal prior to the deadlines specified in our By-laws.
stockholder nominations of directors
Stockholders who wish to nominate a person for election as a director of Ashland at an annual meeting must strictly comply with the requirements of Section 3.03 of the By-laws. These requirements include providing notice to the Corporate Secretary of Ashland not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders of Ashland,
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 77 |
questions and answers about the annual meeting
provided that if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days earlier or more than 60 days later than such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder must be delivered or received not earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. For the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders, this means such nominations must be received by the Corporate Secretary no earlier than September 23, 2025 and no later than the close of business on October 23, 2025. Section 3.03 of the By-laws details the information and statements that must be included in connection with any shareholder nomination.
Additionally, Section 3.16 of the By-laws permit a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, that has owned at least 3% of Ashland’s common stock for at least the past three years, to nominate for election to the Board the greater of (a) two individuals, and (b) individuals comprising up to 20% of the Board, and include information about such nominees in Ashland’s proxy statement for the annual meeting. (each, a “Proxy Access Nominee”). Any such nomination must be received by the Corporate Secretary of Ashland in accordance with the timing requirements described in the preceding paragraph. Section 3.16 of the By-laws details the information and statements that must be included in connection with the nomination of a Proxy Access Nominee.
In addition to complying with the procedures described above, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of a director nominee other than Ashland’s nominees for consideration at the 2026 Annual Meeting must also comply with the SEC’s “universal proxy rules” pursuant to Rule 14a-19 of the Exchange Act. Under Rule 14a-19, stockholders who intend to solicit such proxies must provide a notice to the Corporate Secretary of Ashland no later than November 22, 2025. If the 2026 Annual Meeting is set for a date which is not within 30 calendar days of the anniversary of the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting, then notice must be provided by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2026 Annual Meeting or the 10th calendar day following the day on which Ashland first publicly announces the date of the 2026 Annual Meeting.
The chair of any meeting of stockholders to elect directors and Ashland’s Board may refuse to acknowledge and consider any nomination that is not made in compliance with the above-described procedures. Individuals recommended by stockholders in accordance with the above-described procedures will be evaluated by the Governance and Nominating Committee in the same manner as individuals who are identified for potential nomination to the Board by other means.
further information concerning stockholder proposals and nominations
A copy of the By-laws, as amended and restated, are attached as Exhibit 3.3 to Ashland’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 2024 and available through its website (www.sec.gov). Upon written request to the Corporate Secretary of Ashland, Ashland will provide any shareholder, without charge, a copy of the procedures governing stockholder proposals or the nomination of directors.
Stockholder nominations or proposals should be submitted to Ashland’s Corporate Secretary in writing at 8145 Blazer Drive, Wilmington, Delaware, 19808, Attention: Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary will direct the materials to the Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee.
78 / ashland.com |
|
|
proxy solicitation
Ashland is soliciting the proxies to which this Proxy Statement relates. Solicitations may be made by mail, telephone, facsimile, electronic means and personal interview and all costs of soliciting proxies on behalf of Ashland, including the cost of preparing and mailing the Notice and this Proxy Statement and any accompanying material, will be borne by Ashland. Expenses associated with this solicitation which will be borne by Ashland may also include charges and expenses of banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding proxies and proxy materials to beneficial owners of shares. Solicitations may also be made by personal interview, mail, telephone, facsimile, email or otherwise by directors, officers and other employees of Ashland, but Ashland will not additionally compensate its directors, officers or other employees for these services.
Copies of proxy materials and the 2024 Annual Report will be supplied to brokers, dealers, banks and voting trustees, or their nominees, for the purpose of soliciting proxies from beneficial owners.
Ashland is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. Ashland must also pay brokerage firms, and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares held in street name, certain fees associated with forwarding proxy materials by mail to beneficial owners and obtaining beneficial owners’ voting instructions.
Ashland has engaged Alliance Advisors, LLC to act as Ashland’s proxy solicitor in connection with the proposals to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. Pursuant to Ashland’s agreement with Alliance Advisors, LLC, it will, among other things, provide advice regarding proxy solicitation issues and solicit proxies from Ashland’s stockholders on Ashland’s behalf in connection with the Annual Meeting. For these services, Ashland will pay a fee of up to $13,000 plus expenses. Ashland has agreed to indemnify Alliance Advisors, LLC against certain liabilities relating to, or arising out of, its engagement.
other matters
The Board of Directors does not intend to bring other matters before the Annual Meeting, except items incidental to the conduct of the meeting. However, on all matters properly brought before the meeting by the Board of Directors or by others, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy, or their substitutes, will vote in accordance with their best judgment.
Your vote is very important no matter how many shares you own. You are urged to read this Proxy Statement carefully and, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, to promptly submit a proxy: (1) by telephone or over the Internet following the instructions on the Notice or proxy card or (2) by signing, dating and returning your proxy card.
If you have any questions or require any assistance with voting your shares, please contact Ashland’s proxy solicitor:
Alliance Advisors, LLC
200 Broadacres Drive
3rd Floor
Bloomfield, NJ 07003
Toll-Free: 855-973-0095
Email: ASH@allianceadvisors.com
Your cooperation in giving this matter your prompt attention is appreciated.
Robin E. Lampkin |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
2025 proxy statement / 79 |
appendix a — use of non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP reconciliations
use of non-GAAP financial measures
Ashland has included within this document the following non-GAAP financial measures, on both a consolidated and reportable segment basis, which are not defined within U.S. GAAP and do not purport to be alternatives to net income or cash flows from operating activities as a measure of operating performance or cash flows:
Management believes the use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA measures on a consolidated and reportable segment basis assists investors in understanding the ongoing operating performance by presenting comparable financial results between periods. Ashland believes that by removing the impact of depreciation and amortization and excluding certain non-cash charges, amounts spent on interest and taxes and certain other charges that are highly variable from year to year, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide Ashland’s investors with performance measures that reflect the impact to operations from trends in changes in sales, margin and operating expenses, providing a perspective not immediately apparent from net income and operating income. The adjustments Ashland makes to derive the non-GAAP measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA exclude items which may cause short-term fluctuations in net income and operating income and which Ashland does not consider to be the fundamental attributes or primary drivers of its business. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide disclosure on the same basis as that used by Ashland’s management to evaluate financial performance on a consolidated and reportable segment basis and provide consistency in our financial reporting, facilitate internal and external comparisons of Ashland’s historical operating performance and its business units and provide continuity to investors for comparability purposes.
The Adjusted diluted EPS metric enables Ashland to demonstrate what effect key items have on an earnings per diluted share basis by taking income (loss) from continuing operations, adjusted for key items after tax that have been identified in the Adjusted EBITDA table, and dividing by the average outstanding diluted shares for the applicable period. Ashland’s management believes this presentation is helpful to illustrate how the key items have impacted this metric during the applicable period.
The Adjusted diluted EPS, excluding intangibles amortization expense metric enables Ashland to demonstrate the impact of non-cash intangible amortization expense on EPS, in addition to the key items previously mentioned. Ashland’s management believes this presentation is helpful to illustrate how previous acquisitions impact applicable period results.
|
|
2025 proxy statement / a-1 |
appendix a — use of non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP reconciliations
These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered supplemental in nature and should not be construed as more significant than comparable measures defined by U.S. GAAP. Limitations associated with the use of these non-GAAP financial measures include that these measures do not present all of the amounts associated with our results as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The non-GAAP measures provided are used by Ashland management and may not be determined in a manner consistent with the methodologies used by other companies. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide a supplemental presentation of Ashland’s operating performance on a consolidated and reportable segment basis. Adjusted EBITDA generally includes adjustments for items that impact comparability between periods.
business unit EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA
The EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA amounts presented for each business unit are provided as a means to enhance the understanding of financial measurements that Ashland has internally determined to be relevant measures of comparison for each segment. Each of these non-GAAP financial measures is defined as follows: EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortization) and Adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA adjusted for key items, which may include pro forma effects for significant acquisitions or divestitures, as applicable). Ashland does not allocate items to each reportable segment below operating income, such as interest expense and income taxes. As a result, business unit EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are reconciled directly to operating income since it is the most directly comparable Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income caption.
non-GAAP reconciliations
Ashland inc. and consolidated subsidiaries
reconciliation of non-GAAP—adjusted
EBITDA
(In millions) |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Net interest and other financing expense |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (a) |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
(loss) from discontinued operations (net of taxes) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
Key items included in EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Nutraceuticals impairment and sale |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Environmental reserve adjustments |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Restructuring, separation and other costs |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Loss (gain) on pension and other postretirement plan remeasurements(b) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
Asset impairments |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Other plant optimization costs |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Nutraceuticals VAT reserve |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Argentina currency devaluation impact |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Legal settlement |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Income on acquisitions and divestitures, net |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
ICMS Brazil tax credit |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Held for sale depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Total key items included in EBITDA |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA(b) |
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
Total key items included in EBITDA |
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on securities |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
Total key items, before tax |
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
a-2 / ashland.com |
|
|
appendix a — use of non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP reconciliations
diluted EPS and adjusted diluted EPS
The following table reflects the U.S. GAAP calculation for the income (loss) from continuing operations adjusted for the cumulative diluted EPS effect for key items after tax that have been identified in the Adjusted EBITDA table in the previous section. Key items are defined as the financial effects from significant transactions that may have caused short-term fluctuations in net income and/or operating income which Ashland believes do not accurately reflect Ashland’s underlying business performance and trends. The Adjusted Diluted EPS for the income (loss) from continuing operations and Adjusted Diluted EPS from continuing operations excluding intangibles amortization expense in the following table have been prepared to illustrate these ongoing effects on Ashland’s operations. Management believes investors and analysts use this financial measure in assessing Ashland’s business performance and that presenting this non-GAAP measure on a consolidated basis assists investors in better understanding Ashland’s ongoing business performance and enhancing their ability to compare period-to-period financial results.
|
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Diluted EPS from continuing operations (as reported) |
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.13 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.20 |
|
|
Key items, before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Nutaceuticals impairment and sale |
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Acclerated depreciation |
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Environmental reserve adjustments |
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
Restructuring, separation and other costs |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
Loss (gain) on pension and other postretirement plan remeasurements |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
Asset impairments |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Other plant optimization costs |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Nutraceuticals VAT reserve |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Argentina currency devaluation impact |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Legal settlement |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Income on acquisitions and divestitures, net |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
|
ICMS Brazil tax credit |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Held for sale depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized (gain) loss on securities |
|
|
(1.20 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.54 |
) |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
Key items, before tax |
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
Tax effect of key items(a) |
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.38 |
) |
|
Key items, after tax |
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
Tax specific key items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Uncertain tax positions |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
Restructuring and separation activity |
|
|
(2.30 |
) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
Other tax reform related activity |
|
|
(2.66 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Tax specific key items(b) |
|
|
(4.68 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.83 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
Total key items |
|
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.45 |
) |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
Adjusted diluted EPS from continuing operations (non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
3.20 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.37 |
|
|
Amortization expense adjustment (net of tax)(c) |
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
Adjusted diluted EPS from continuing operations (non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.07 |
|
|
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
2024 proxy statement / a-3 |
appendix a — use of non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP reconciliations
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA reconciliation—life sciences
The EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA amounts presented within this business section are provided as a means to enhance the understanding of financial measurements that Ashland has internally determined to be relevant measures of comparison for each segment. Each of these non-GAAP measures is defined as follows: EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortization), Adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA adjusted for key items as applicable), and Adjusted EBITDA margin (Adjusted EBITDA divided by sales). Ashland does not allocate items to each reportable segment below operating income, such as interest expense and income taxes. As a result, reportable segment EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are reconciled directly to operating income since it is the most directly comparable Statements of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (Loss) caption.
The following EBITDA presentation for the years ended September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022, is provided as a means to enhance the understanding of financial measurements that Ashland has internally determined to be relevant measures of comparison for the results of Life Sciences.
|
Life Sciences |
||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(a) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
Restructuring and other costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Environmental reserve adjustments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Held for sale for depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA reconciliation—personal care
The following EBITDA presentation (as defined and described in the section above) for the years ended September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022, is provided as a means to enhance the understanding of financial measurements that Ashland has internally determined to be relevant measures of comparison for the results of Personal Care.
|
Personal Care |
||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(a) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other plant optimization costs |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Asset impairment |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA reconciliation — Specialty Additives
The following EBITDA presentation (as defined and described in the section above) for the years ended September 30, 2024, 2023 and 2022 below is provided as a means to enhance the understanding of financial measurements that Ashland has internally determined to be relevant measures of comparison for the results of Specialty Additives.
|
|
Specialty Additives |
|||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(a) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other plant optimization costs |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Asset impairment |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Environmental reserve adjustments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
a-4 / ashland.com |
|
|
appendix a — use of non-GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP reconciliations
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA reconciliation—intermediates
The following EBITDA presentation (as defined and described in the section above) for the years ended 2024, 2023 and 2022 is provided as a means to enhance the understanding of financial measurements that Ashland has internally determined to be relevant measures of comparison for the results of Intermediates.
|
|
Intermediates |
|||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
Ashland inc. and consolidated subsidiaries
reconciliation of other non-GAAP data
(preliminary and unaudited)
adjusted EBITDA used for incentive compensation
(In millions) |
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
Management Exceptions(1) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA used for incentive compensation |
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
forward-looking statements
This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Ashland has identified some of these forward-looking statements with words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “is likely,” “predicts,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “objectives,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “plans” and “intends” and the negative of these words or other comparable terminology. Ashland may from time to time make forward-looking statements in its annual reports, quarterly reports and other filings with the SEC, news releases and other written and oral communications. These forward-looking statements are based on Ashland’s expectations and assumptions, as of the date such statements are made, regarding Ashland’s future operating performance and financial condition, as well as the economy and other future events or circumstances.
Ashland’s expectations and assumptions include, without limitation, internal forecasts and analyses of current and future market conditions and trends, management plans and strategies, operating efficiencies, cost savings and economic conditions (such as prices, supply and demand, cost of raw materials, and the ability to recover raw-material cost increases through price increases), and risks and uncertainties associated with the following: the impact of acquisitions and/or divestitures Ashland has made or may make (including the possibility that Ashland may not realize the anticipated benefits from such transactions); Ashland’s substantial indebtedness (including the possibility that such indebtedness and related restrictive covenants may adversely affect Ashland’s future cash flows, results of operations, financial condition and its ability to repay debt); execution risks associated with our growth strategies; the competitive nature of our business; severe weather, natural disasters, public health crises, cyber events and legal proceedings and claims (including product recalls, environmental and asbestos matters); the ongoing Ukraine/Russia and Israel/Hamas conflict in the geographies in which Ashland operates, the end markets Ashland serves and on Ashland’s supply chain and customers; and without limitation, risks and uncertainties affecting Ashland that are described in Ashland’s most recent Form 10-K (including Item 1A Risk Factors) filed with the SEC, which is available on Ashland’s website at http://investor.ashland.com or on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. Various risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from those stated, projected or implied by any forward-looking statements. Ashland believes its expectations and assumptions are reasonable, but there can be no assurance that the expectations reflected herein will be achieved. Unless legally required, Ashland undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this Proxy Statement whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
|
|
2024 proxy statement / a-5 |
Ashland always solving PROXY Ashland Inc. 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Tuesday, January 21, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time For Stockholders of record as of November 25, 2024 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned stockholder hereby appoints Guillermo Novo and Robin E. Lampkin, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint a substitute, and hereby authorize them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all shares of Common Stock of Ashland Inc. (the “Company”) held of record by the stockholder at the close of business on November 25, 2024 at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 21, 2025, virtually, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for director described in Proposal One and a vote FOR Proposals Two and Three. The proxy holders are authorized to vote, in accordance with their discretion, on all matters incident to the conduct of the meeting and upon other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, subject to compliance with Rule 14a-4(c) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations (Continued and to be marked, dated, and signed on the other side) PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. If you hold shares in any Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or 401(k) savings plan of the Company (the “Plans”), then this proxy card, when signed and returned, or your telephone or Internet proxy, will constitute voting instructions on matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof in accordance with the instructions given herein to the trustee for shares held in any of the Plans. Shares in each of the Plans for which voting instructions are not received by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, January 15, 2025, or if no choice is specified, will be voted by an independent fiduciary. You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE), but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The named proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign (on the reverse side) and return this card. Annual Meeting to be held live via the Internet – please visit web.view proxy.com/ash/2025 for more details
Please mark your votes like this ☒The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for director described in Proposal One, and a vote FOR Proposals Two and Three. Proposal One: Election of Directors. NOMINEES: FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN (1) Steven D. Bishop (2) Sanat Chattopadhyay (3) Suzan F. Harrison (4) Ashish K. Kulkarni (5) Susan L. Main (6) Guillermo Novo (7) Sergio Pedreiro (8) Jerome A. Peribere (9) Scott A. Tozier Proposal Two: Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Ashland's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2025. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Proposal Three: Approval of the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation paid to Ashland's named executive officers. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN Note: To consider any other business properly before the meeting.DO IN THIS AREA (Stockholder Name & Address Data) Authorized Signatures – Must be completed for your instructions to be executed. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your account. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy/Vote Form. Address Change/Comments: (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark box.) Date Signature (and Title, if applicable) Signature (if held jointly) CONTROL NUMBER PLEASE DETACH ALONG PERFORATED LINE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED. PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS Please have your 11-digit control number ready when voting by Internet or Telephone You must register to attend the Annual Meeting online and/or participate at web.viewproxy.com/ash/2025 INTERNET Vote Your Proxy on the Internet: Before the Annual Meeting: Go to www.AALvote.com/ASH. Use the Internet to vote your proxy and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 20, 2025 (or 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 15, 2025 for Plan participants). During the Annual Meeting: Go to web.viewproxy.com/ash/2025. You may attend the Annual Meeting via the Internet and vote during the Annual Meeting. Have your proxy card available when you access the above websites. Follow the prompts to vote your shares. TELEPHONE Vote Your Proxy by Phone: Call 1-866-804-9616 Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 20, 2025 (or 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 15, 2025 for Plan participants). Have your proxy card available when you call. Follow the voting instructions to vote your shares MAIL Vote Your Proxy by Mail: Mark, sign, and date your proxy card, then detach it, and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.